On 4/19/08, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> > On 4/17/08, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Yes, the vector version of packet receive is tough. I'll take a look
> at
> > > your patch. Basically, you need to associate a set of RX vectors w
Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Liu, Eric E wrote:
>> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 16 April 2008 01:45:34 Liu, Eric E wrote: [...]
>>> Actually... we could have kvmtrace itself insert the metadata, so
>>> there would be no chance of it being overwritten in the kernel
>>> buffers. The header
--- On Sat, 4/19/08, Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] Second KVM process hangs eating 80-100% CPU on host
> during startup
> To: "Alex Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.n
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:47:31PM -0700, Alex Davis wrote:
> --- On Fri, 4/18/08, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] Second KVM process hangs eating 80-100% CPU on
> > host during startup
> [snip]
>
> I tried booting the
--- On Fri, 4/18/08, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] Second KVM process hangs eating 80-100% CPU on host
> during startup
[snip]
I tried booting the guest with 'lpj=10682525' to work around the
calibrate_delay issue, but th
各位老总:您们好!
诚祝:您们在2008年里;有鼠不尽的快乐!鼠不尽的收获!鼠不尽的钞票!
鼠不尽的幸福!鼠不尽的美满生活!愿: 您们阖家欢乐!幸福安康!
我公司可以长期提供:出口报关单,核销单,等等一系列手续;代理:出口
报关,商检,境内外运输..等等;还可以代办:出口欧盟许可证,欧盟产地证;
并且还有(广州国际贸易交易会)的摊位可以转让;价格特别优惠;有意者请来邮件
或来电联系。谢谢合作!
电话:0755-81153047。
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've got some qemu crashes while trying to passthrough an ide device
> > to a kvm guest. After some investigation, it turned out that
> register_ioport_{read/write} will abort o
DOH. I had the 2 new ones backwards in the formats file.
thanks for pointing that out,
david
Liu, Eric E wrote:
>
> I mean the value of PTE_WRITE you write in the formats file ( 0x00020016
> )should be same with KVM_TRC_PTE_WRITE you define in kvm.h,
> but now it is 0x00020015. if not what yo
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 4/17/08, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, the vector version of packet receive is tough. I'll take a look at
>> your patch. Basically, you need to associate a set of RX vectors with each
>> VLANClientState and then when it comes time to deliver a pac
On 4/17/08, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, the vector version of packet receive is tough. I'll take a look at
> your patch. Basically, you need to associate a set of RX vectors with each
> VLANClientState and then when it comes time to deliver a packet to the VLAN,
> before ca
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 01:22:28PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > I've been able to reproduce the problem. Symptoms are that when using
> > NOHZ vcpu0 LAPIC timer is ticking far less than the others (apparently
> > vcpu0
> > is the only one ticking "correctly"):
> >
> >
> > nohz=on with kvmcl
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:29:47PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > I just reproduced this on a UP guest. Were you seeing the exact same
> > stack trace in the guest with kvm-64 ?
>
> I've been able to reproduce the problem. Symptoms are that when using
> NOHZ vcpu0 LAPIC timer is ticking far les
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Marcelo Tosatti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:34:57PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>
> > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:53:36PM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I also tried paravirt clock again in latest git with kvm-6
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:34:57PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:53:36PM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I also tried paravirt clock again in latest git with kvm-65 patch
> > applied, and problem with cpu-lockups persists:
> >
> > [10813.654806] BUG: sof
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 06:56:41PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: Ben-Ami Yassour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben-Ami Yassour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Signed-off-by: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > libkvm/libkvm.c | 24 ++
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 06:50:03PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: Ben-Ami Yassour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben-Ami Yassour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Signed-off-by: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 59
> >
Ian Kirk wrote:
> 2.6.24.4-64.fc8PAE noexec=off:
>
> Using normal F8 modules
> qemu-kvm dies in the same way
>
> > 2. Loading the kernel modules that come with kvm-66
>
> Against 2.6.24.4-64.fc8 it works.
2.6.24.4-64.fc8PAE with kvm-66 module seems to work OK.
I guess that solves that little p
17 matches
Mail list logo