Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Clean up MMU functions to take struct kvm when appropriate (v2)

Anthony Liguori wrote: > Sorry, I didn't guilt refresh before sending. I'll have to modify my > patchbomb > script to check for that to avoid this in the future. > > Some of the MMU functions take a struct kvm_vcpu even though they effect all > VCPUs. This patch cleans up some of them to instead

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Clean up MMU functions to take struct kvm when appropriate

Anthony Liguori wrote: > Some of the MMU functions take a struct kvm_vcpu even though they effect all > VCPUs. This patch cleans up some of them to instead take a struct kvm. This > makes things a bit more clear. > > The main thing that was confusing me was whether certain functions need to be >

[kvm-devel] [PATCH] Clean up MMU functions to take struct kvm when appropriate (v2)

Sorry, I didn't guilt refresh before sending. I'll have to modify my patchbomb script to check for that to avoid this in the future. Some of the MMU functions take a struct kvm_vcpu even though they effect all VCPUs. This patch cleans up some of them to instead take a struct kvm. This makes thi

[kvm-devel] [PATCH] Clean up MMU functions to take struct kvm when appropriate

Some of the MMU functions take a struct kvm_vcpu even though they effect all VCPUs. This patch cleans up some of them to instead take a struct kvm. This makes things a bit more clear. The main thing that was confusing me was whether certain functions need to be called on all VCPUs. Signed-off-b