Re: [Kwant] Regarding smatrix and spin

2017-01-24 Thread Camilla Espedal
Dear Anton, Thanks again for all your help. I will try to do it the linux way. Just one more thing regarding this. I wrote a script in the old Kwant to find the total conductance and compare it to the one in your notebook. While the two plots are qualitatively similar, they are not the same. A

Re: [Kwant] Regarding smatrix and spin

2017-01-24 Thread Anton Akhmerov
Dear Camilla, Could the difference originate from you using a lattice constant of 2 instead of 1? Anton On Tue, Jan 24, 2017, 10:41 Camilla Espedal wrote: > Dear Anton, > > Thanks again for all your help. I will try to do it the linux way. Just > one more thing regarding this. I wrote a script

Re: [Kwant] Regarding smatrix and spin

2017-01-24 Thread Camilla Espedal
Dear Anton, I triend changing it, but that does not solve the problem. Best, Camilla From: Anton Akhmerov [mailto:anton.akhmerov...@gmail.com] Sent: 24. januar 2017 12:36 To: Camilla Espedal Cc: kwant-discuss@kwant-project.org Subject: Re: [Kwant] Regarding smatrix and spin Dear Camilla, Could

Re: [Kwant] Regarding smatrix and spin

2017-01-24 Thread Anton Akhmerov
OK, please double-check the remaining simulation parameters. Anton On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Camilla Espedal wrote: > Dear Anton, > > > > I triend changing it, but that does not solve the problem. > > > > Best, > > Camilla > > From: Anton Akhmerov [mailto:anton.akhmerov...@gmail.com] > Se

Re: [Kwant] Regarding tranlational invariance along 2 directions

2017-01-24 Thread Anton Akhmerov
Dear Anant, You are searching for the wraparound module built by Christoph and previously announce on this mailing list. Please see the original announcement over here: https://www.mail-archive.com/kwant-discuss@kwant-project.org/msg00745.html Once again I would like to remind you to try searchin

Re: [Kwant] Regarding smatrix and spin

2017-01-24 Thread Abbout Adel
Dear Camillia, You called the function make_sys() with the default values for all the parameters, so you used alpha=0.1. On the online example, they changed the value to alpha=0.2 So, just change your parameters to a=1 and alpha=0.2 and you will get the same result. Regards, Adel On Tue, Jan