[LARTC] Re: some can help out with u32 & TBF limitation < 2048 only

2003-07-02 Thread devik
Hi, I can't test the script just now as I'm in important project (and don't want to crash my comp). What should I expect after running the script ? In meantime you could change it and use 1 HTB class and 3000 u32 filters pointing to the same class - the we will know where the limit is. --

Re: [LARTC] imq + htb =~/kazaa/

2003-07-02 Thread ???????? ?????
In my shaper I run htb on a bridge. I shape with success the kazaa and winmx traffic. As about Kazaa you have to place filters for tcp port 1214 and it will work fine. Best regards Stamatis Esteban wrote: Someone posted once a script based on htb+imq to handle kazaa and web traffic..both direc

Re: [LARTC] imq + htb =~/kazaa/

2003-07-02 Thread GoMi .
I have no idea what you are talking about, since i never saw that email. If you want to filter traffic, anaylize the paquet contents, searching for a string common on kazaa packets and http traffic packets, so you can mark then and hence redirect them to the correct queue. ¿Get what i say?

Re: [LARTC] netfilter resets TCP conversation that was DNATed fromthe local machine to another

2003-07-02 Thread Patrick McHardy
Hi Michael, you should enter this as a bugreport in the netfilter bugtracking system (bugzilla.netfilter.org). I noticed none of your mails contains the complete ruleset you use, you should also include this. Bye, Patrick Michael wrote: The netfilter list had no answer for this. I have a configur

[LARTC] imq + htb =~/kazaa/

2003-07-02 Thread Esteban
Someone posted once a script based on htb+imq to handle kazaa and web traffic..both directions, download and upload. If someone still have it, could it post again? i searched on posted mailing list but couldnt find it. Thanks! ___ LARTC mailing list /

[LARTC] netfilter resets TCP conversation that was DNATed from the localmachine to another

2003-07-02 Thread Michael
The netfilter list had no answer for this. I have a configuration: /\ .0.{8,9} .{0,1}.1 /--\ 1.2.3.{4,5,6} ( ) | Web server |-+-| firewall |---( Internet ) \/ |eth0 | Squid | eth1 (

RE: [LARTC] Question on prio qdisc

2003-07-02 Thread Cain, Joseph
Thank you Lars and Wing for your responses. I just ran another experiment using RED on the lowest priority flow as suggested by Wing. I had used RED before (on all flows) without success. In this experiment, specified a large queue size for the interface. In this case the result was roughly the sa

[LARTC] Using multiple uplinks

2003-07-02 Thread Michel Angelo da Silva Pereira
Hi, I'm with a problem here on configuring our server to use multiple uplinks with different providers. The packet goes though on my way, but there is some lost packets that I don't known where it's going and causing my link to goes slow and stop sending/receiving data. Here i'm listing the r

Re: [LARTC] Question on prio qdisc

2003-07-02 Thread Lars Landmark
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Cain, Joseph wrote: > > I have been doing some experiments with the > prio qdisc. I haven't tried to understand the > code, but the behavior I have observed in the > experiments leads me to believe that the prio > qdisc operates in the following manner when the > interface qu

[LARTC] IMQ, HTB and large bandwidth ...

2003-07-02 Thread Julien Gateaud
Hi, Maybe someone could help me with this ... I'm doing some rate limiting tests with large bandwidth (>3MBytes). HTB qdisc + IMQ just work fine on outgoing traffic, results are almost perfect but with incoming traffic it's not the same ... Results are quite good up to 3MBytes of total shaped in

Re: [LARTC] Question on prio qdisc

2003-07-02 Thread Cheng Kwok Wing, William
Hi,   You can refer to http://lxr.linux.no/source/net/sched/sch_prio.c for the source code of prio qdisc.   If you look at the drop function of prio (prio_drop), it really drops packet with precedence of low to high priority. But when a incoming packet finds that there is no room in the queue, it's

Re: [LARTC] Proxy question

2003-07-02 Thread ???????? ?????
Leigh Waldie wrote: Hel :-) Well this is a good oppinion but, what does it happen when somebody make a big request, the proxy will be unshaped thus it will allocate whole the line. Perhaps you need to put the shaping on the same machine as the proxy, this should allow you to mark the pack

Re: [LARTC] Proxy question

2003-07-02 Thread Leigh Waldie
> Hel :-) > Well this is a good oppinion but, what does it happen when somebody make > a big request, the proxy will be unshaped thus it will allocate whole > the line. Perhaps you need to put the shaping on the same machine as the proxy, this should allow you to mark the packets (i think squi

Re: [LARTC] Proxy question

2003-07-02 Thread ???????? ?????
Hel :-) Well this is a good oppinion but, what does it happen when somebody make a big request, the proxy will be unshaped thus it will allocate whole the line. A good option is to place another shaper between the proxy and the internet. To make it simpler to place the proxy in our DMZ, and

Re: [LARTC] Proxy question

2003-07-02 Thread Leigh Waldie
Why not change your topology so that you have Firewall->Shaper-->Proxy->Internet This way you have more control over the traffic. Admittedly, you are not truly shaping the total bandwidth available to you (some of the traffic will be returning to your clien

Re: [LARTC] tc statistics

2003-07-02 Thread Simon Stemplinger
Joerg Hartmann wrote: Hello, i have to write a script to visualize the output of tc -s class show dev eth0 with rrdtool. Or does anybody know of such a script , which is available for download ? I assume the bps in "rate 5728bps 34pps" is Byte per Second. Is that right ? How can i set all the co

[LARTC] tc statistics

2003-07-02 Thread Joerg Hartmann
Hello, i have to write a script to visualize the output of tc -s class show dev eth0 with rrdtool. Or does anybody know of such a script , which is available for download ? I assume the bps in "rate 5728bps 34pps" is Byte per Second. Is that right ? How can i set all the counters back to zero ?

Re: [LARTC] Proxy question

2003-07-02 Thread Chijioke Kalu
Yes am having the same problem,If i get it fixed in time, i'll post my script, unfortunately delay pools in squid werent as effective as the HTB, am trying to use steff's IMQ with iptable which shld solve the problem. you could search the LARTC archives, though am yet to find someone that had t

[LARTC] Question on prio qdisc

2003-07-02 Thread Cain, Joseph
I have been doing some experiments with the prio qdisc. I haven't tried to understand the code, but the behavior I have observed in the experiments leads me to believe that the prio qdisc operates in the following manner when the interface queue is full: 1) Suppose that we are operating with the

Re: [LARTC] Proxy question

2003-07-02 Thread ???????? ?????
Hello Radu, Well I found the delay pools at the squid configration. I need to know if there's any alternative way to slowdown the traffic for a specific IP address without modifying anything in the proxy server. Radu-Mihail Obada wrote: If you're using Squid for the proxy service, check out the

Re: [LARTC] Proxy question

2003-07-02 Thread Radu-Mihail Obada
If you're using Squid for the proxy service, check out the docs, it has the ability to limit bandwith for specific ips, classes, etc. Regards, Radu ÓôáěÜôçň ĘĺęÝň a scris: > Hell everybody, > Yesterday I faced a problem with the shaper I use. Here's my topology > and I'll describe the problem lat

Re: [LARTC] htb class statistics: question

2003-07-02 Thread Stef Coene
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 10:34, Ruslan Spivak wrote: > Hello. > > tc -s -d class show dev eth0 > > i see numbers in 'droppped' fields. Why packets are dropped? If you send too much packets so the ceil is broken, packets can be dropped. Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Using Linux as bandwidth manag

[LARTC] htb class statistics: question

2003-07-02 Thread Ruslan Spivak
Hello. tc -s -d class show dev eth0 i see numbers in 'droppped' fields. Why packets are dropped? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Ruslan ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] Proxy question

2003-07-02 Thread Σταμάτης Κεκές
Hell everybody, Yesterday I faced a problem with the shaper I use. Here's my topology and I'll describe the problem later after the topology. 10.0.1.0 /24 10.0.1.100 eth0 eth1eth0 10.0.1.1 eth1 +-+ +-+ +---