Hi, i test wonder shaper and these are the result:
I have ADSL 512Kbits/s downtreams 128Kbit/s downtreams
If i set
DOWNLINK=512
UPLINK=128
UPLINK90=105
My final bandwith tested is:
40 Kbytes/s downstream and 9 Kbytes/s uptreams.
So testing with diferent values i correct the problem using this:
Dear All,
I just wander,
1. Can i use wandersharp and also apply my current htb to minimalist
latency ? How, any example ?
2. How the rule to said 192.168.0.1/24, but not the 192.168.0.10 ?
(i use the htb init)
3. I've put djbdns behind the htb, but it look like sometime it make
udp flood.
Hello, LARTC-List
I still try to get my traffic-shaping done with Wondershaper 1.1a, but it does not work
as expected. When I run the script, the verbose output looks good (using a
SuSE-8.2-SMP-box with iproute2-2.4.7-473):
+ DOWNLINK=1800
+ UPLINK=150
+ DEV=ppp0
+ NOPRIOHOSTSRC=
+ NOPRIOHOSTDST
- Original Message -
From: "Arkadiusz Miskiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LARTC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 5:17 PM
Subject: [LARTC] problem with htb rates | small rates question
> Hi,
>
> I'm using 2.4.20 kernel with htb updated to match htb from 2.4.21 +
> patche
Hi,
I'm using 2.4.20 kernel with htb updated to match htb from 2.4.21 +
patches on devik's page.
My setup is simple:
192.168.0.134(LAN machine)--eth0-linuxRT-ppp0 (adsl, pppoe involved)
192.168.0.234(LAN machine)+
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 htb default 22 r2q 1
tc class add dev eth0 p
Hi,
I would like to know if IMQ (http://trash.net/~kaber/imq/) is going
to be ported to the 2.6 kernel.
Please let me know.
--
S.
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi Patrick,
Sincere thanks for your time & help!
> i assume you mean CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK and not
> CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_MARK.
Yup -- sorry!
> i would start with putting some printks in ipt_local_hook
> (net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_mangle.c) before the call to ip_route_me_harder
> and in ip_rout
