Re: [LARTC] What's wrong here? HELP PLEASE!!!!

2003-10-08 Thread Lawrence MacIntyre
I'm grasping at straws here, but is it possible that you put your new tc in, for example, /usr/local/sbin/tc and your script is calling the original version in /sbin/tc ? You shouldn't have to patch the kernel, and the patched tc should work. When you run the script, is the first error

[LARTC] Excess bandwidth sharing

2003-10-08 Thread Tom Olexa
Hello there, I do tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb r2q 1 default 12 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 64kbit ceil 512kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 256kbit ceil 512kbit tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 \

[LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?

2003-10-08 Thread Anton Yurchenko
Hello, I`ve been using htb v2 for more then a year without any major problems. Recently I needed to upgrade to newer kernel becouse of non LARTC related issues. After installing 2.4.22 when the htb qdisc was attached to the interface even without any rules, I was not able to send more ~1mbit

Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?

2003-10-08 Thread nuclearcat
Hello Anton, Wednesday, October 8, 2003, 4:49:30 PM, you wrote: I am using HTB3 with more than 10 megabits customers, and amount of classes about 100-200 without any problem. Only one what i do - i make filter with lowest priority, to not pass ass unclassified traffic to default class, just to

AW: [LARTC] Tc - Class HTB - Filter u32 - Match ip dport

2003-10-08 Thread Jan Gerritsen
Hi, ftp get test local: test remote: test 227 Entering Passive Mode (203,200,72,102,12,231) 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for test (1025830 bytes). ##

Re: [LARTC] htb v3 not as good as htb v2?

2003-10-08 Thread Lawrence MacIntyre
I've used HTB and CBQ to protect MPEG2 traffic streams from UDP traffic over 100 Mb/s interfaces. I have not yet attempted this with 1000 Mb/s interfaces, but I hope to get to that this year (it it much more difficult to measure accurately at this speed). On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 09:49, Anton

Re: [LARTC] filter

2003-10-08 Thread Catalin BOIE
Don't worry. It's tc fault (or maybe kernel). The filters are once in the kernel but are showed no_of_prios_used times. On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Victor wrote: The difrence betwen these 2 configurations is only the prio parameter from the second filter, from each configutation. (tc filter add dev

[LARTC] tc filter expression

2003-10-08 Thread Niels Vorgaard Christensen
Hi. I am working on a router with three interfaces. eth2 and eth0 are connected to two different Internet providers. The interface eth1 are connected to an internal network. Now I need a tc filter expression that will determine which interface the packet was routed in through to be able classify

Re: [LARTC] tc filter expression

2003-10-08 Thread Catalin BOIE
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Niels Vorgaard Christensen wrote: Hi. I am working on a router with three interfaces. eth2 and eth0 are connected to two different Internet providers. The interface eth1 are connected to an internal network. Now I need a tc filter expression that will determine which