[LARTC] (no subject)

2004-03-06 Thread Sam
Hi, are there any graphical frontends to iproute2/tc that are known to work under Fedora core 1 ? regards, Sam. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[LARTC] Some questions about DS routing

2004-03-06 Thread Ricardo Pedro
Hi, Im doing a research in IPv6 / DiffServ / Routing and I can't find any answers at others mailing lists. Is anyone here that ant hint for me. Best Regards Ricardo Pedro --- Begin Message --- Doing more tests I think that the problem of TC is with this combination. For root ingress and in the

Re: [LARTC] Re: Blue and SFB

2004-03-06 Thread Nuutti Kotivuori
Patrick McHardy wrote: > I've completed the port and tested it yesterday, unfortunately it's > not useable in the real world as is. There is a strong bias against > non-ECN flows because their packets are simply dropped instead of > marked. At high load (50 ECN vs. 1 non-ECN flow) and a marking > p

Re: [LARTC] Re: Blue and SFB

2004-03-06 Thread Patrick McHardy
Nuutti Kotivuori wrote: Patrick McHardy wrote: I've completed the port and tested it yesterday, unfortunately it's not useable in the real world as is. There is a strong bias against non-ECN flows because their packets are simply dropped instead of marked. At high load (50 ECN vs. 1 non-ECN flow)

Re: [LARTC] Re: Blue and SFB

2004-03-06 Thread Patrick McHardy
Nuutti Kotivuori wrote: But, as the implementation is rather old, it would require a complete overhaul for 2.6 I think. It is a shame it wasn't worked in to the Linux kernel when it was still current, as I think the algorithm could have a lot of uses. I've completed the port and tested it yesterda

Re: [LARTC] htb classes

2004-03-06 Thread Stef Coene
On Sunday 29 February 2004 22:30, Ciprian Niculescu wrote: > hi, > > i want 5 classes that have rate 50, and ceil to max(or near) and that > borrow bandwidth. > but which config is better and why: It depends on what you want to do. In the first example, the traffic will be equally divided and eac

Re: [LARTC] Limiting bandwidth to entire LAN

2004-03-06 Thread Stef Coene
On Friday 05 March 2004 01:07, Damion de Soto wrote: > Hi Gastón, > > > tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip src > > 1.2.3.0/24 classid 1:30 > > > > tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 100 u32 match ip dst > > 1.2.3.0/24 classid 1:30 > > I'm pretty sure

Re: [LARTC] unable to compile tcc

2004-03-06 Thread Stef Coene
On Saturday 06 March 2004 03:58, Kalai Selvan wrote: > Hi, > > I am unable to compile tcc files. > error is command not found. Can you provide us the full output ? > Whether i need to apply any patch for this? > > Any other way for shaping based on source IP address? You can use the tc binary to

Re: [LARTC] Testing system evironment...not working?

2004-03-06 Thread Stef Coene
HTML is not so nice to read :) But anyway, can you check the tc counters with tc -s -d class show dev eth0 to see if the traffic is flowing in the classes you want it to? > hey, i wrote the queue > schedulling script for controlling the bandwidth use by FTP and HTTP. 8 helps http://g.msn.com/8HM

Re: [LARTC] Limiting bandwidth to entire LAN

2004-03-06 Thread Stef Coene
On Thursday 04 March 2004 15:55, Gastón wrote: > Hi, first of all thanks for all your help. I`m using a bridge and I want to > assign the lan (with public routable ips) only 512Kbits (The internet link > is 1Mbit). What i thought was creating a class with a ceil of 512Kbit an > applying a filter t