panca sorin wrote:
Hello lartc maintainers and users!
I have a router with two NICs. One NIC is connected to the Internet and the
other to my internal LAN. I made a script for priorizing interactive traffic.
The script matches TOS Minimize-Delay for priorizing interactive trafic, and
fwmark
Jonathan Lynch wrote:
Quoting Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jonathan Lynch wrote:
This was down to the tx buffer size on the network card i was using. It
was an Intel 82547EI gigabit Card using the e1000 driver and operating
at 100mbit. The tx buffer was set to 256 which caused this huge
Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
Are we talking about ingress or egress?
Egress, all my ingress experiments worked 100% (mostly prioritization,
that's all)
That's handy I was expecting you to say ingress.
Outbound should be totally under your control.
How much bandwidth do you have (and how much
Hi, I am tring to setup AF on my router using GRED/HTB. I
plan to mark and set the DSCP with iptables and the ingress qdisc to set the
tc_index for the proper GRED vq(1-12).
My question is: Is there a way to allow for
priority between the af classes and within the af classes?
also would it be
On 12/5/05, Andy Furniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
> > Guys
> >
> > Considering the festive season is upon us, thanks to everyone
> > contributing to the list and helping all the readers with your great
> > input! I don't want to mention names, I'll most certainly leave
> >
On 12/5/05, Andreas Klauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 05 December 2005 18:42, Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
> > -= HTB =-
> >
> > Set the parent class for internet traffic to X, with 200 children.
> > Each child has a rate of Y, their totals equal X. Each child also has
> > a ceil of Z. This me
On 12/5/05, Peter Surda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:42:09 +0200 Kenneth Kalmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Guys
> Hi,
>
> >Sharing a link between 200 users
> Been there, done that (1400 users even).
>
> >-= WRR =-
> >My favourite, but with the most disappointment at the
Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
Guys
Considering the festive season is upon us, thanks to everyone
contributing to the list and helping all the readers with your great
input! I don't want to mention names, I'll most certainly leave
someone out.
With this mail I'd like to test some theory on bandwidth man
On Monday 05 December 2005 10:40, Mark Lidstone wrote:
> 1) The sum of all HTB classes under a single HTB qdisc should
> add up to the maximum rate of the qdisc
A HTB qdisc does not have a rate; it's the classes that do. And it's not
all classes, but just parent-children relationship. The s
On Monday 05 December 2005 18:42, Kenneth Kalmer wrote:
> -= HTB =-
>
> Set the parent class for internet traffic to X, with 200 children.
> Each child has a rate of Y, their totals equal X. Each child also has
> a ceil of Z. This means that Z * 200 > X, hence the over subscription.
I'm using pret
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:42:09 +0200 Kenneth Kalmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Guys
Hi,
>Sharing a link between 200 users
Been there, done that (1400 users even).
>-= WRR =-
>My favourite, but with the most disappointment at the moment... I can
>see the weights are adjusted, and our trials have sh
Guys
Considering the festive season is upon us, thanks to everyone
contributing to the list and helping all the readers with your great
input! I don't want to mention names, I'll most certainly leave
someone out.
With this mail I'd like to test some theory on bandwidth management,
with my own suc
Subject: Re: [LARTC] inspecting what's going in a class
Date: Monday 05 December 2005 09:38
From: "Ethy H. Brito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:59:46 -0500
Jason Boxman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Sadly not possible with tc-filter. But perhaps I could do thi
Ok I gave br0 an IP. Now I have a new problem. When the client tries to
access a webserver the traffic redirected to the ip on the bridge to the local
web server. However, the traffic going back to the client machine from the web
server has a source port of 1, this isn't what the client expec
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:59:46 -0500
Jason Boxman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sadly not possible with tc-filter. But perhaps I could do this for tc
> > > with Vincent Perrier's sch_spy module.
> >
> > sch_log is also good for this:
> >
> > http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/sch_log/v0.4/sch_lo
Dnia poniedziałek, 5 grudnia 2005 13:58, Dave Weis napisał(a):
> > That's because you are putting all /24 network into one single HTB. You
> > have to make one HTB (SFQ for every user helps a lot too) for each
> > computer in the network:
> >
> > tc qdisc del root dev eth1
> > tc qdisc add root d
I am trying to get IPP2P working on my router. Thus far I can see
connections being marked (see below), but they don't seem to get saved
or something. When looking at /proc/net/ip_conntrack, nothing has
anything other than 0 for mark. The iptables commands for this are:
iptables -t mangle -A PRERO
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:42:23 +0100
> "AU" == Andreas Unterkircher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AU>
AU> ip ro add 192.168.2.0/24 via 10.2.0.1 dev ethx src 192.168.1.1
AU> the spd policies will then match and encrypt the traffic.
Uff... src in route... something really crazy, even thenks fo
ip ro add 192.168.2.0/24 via 10.2.0.1 dev ethx src 192.168.1.1
the spd policies will then match and encrypt the traffic.
this is the same solution like you have to do for the freeswan
ipsec stack.
for me it works...
Alexander Kotelnikov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb:
>
> > On Mon, 05 Dec 2005
Hi,
It's not for a particular use that I was asking, it was just for my
understanding.
So what I think people are saying is:
1) The sum of all HTB classes under a single HTB qdisc should
add up to the maximum rate of the qdisc
2) HTB's prio is only used when 'borrowing' bandwidth
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 06:08:30 +0100
> "AU" == Andreas Unterkircher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AU>
AU> Alexander Kotelnikov schrieb:
>> Ok, I would not ask all this if I have no problem with
>> tunnelling. With configuration like described above, where multihomed
>> maches have ip-addresse
You can specify the source address
ip route add 192.168.66.0/24 via 192.168.1.2 src {The_Source_IP_of_interface}
Radek Vokál ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) schrieb:
>
> I have two IP for eth0 which correspond to eth0 and eth0:1
> I want to create a route
> to 192.168.66.0/24 via 192.168.0.50 from eth0:1
>
>
I have two IP for eth0 which correspond to eth0 and eth0:1
I want to create a route
to 192.168.66.0/24 via 192.168.0.50 from eth0:1
so I add the route with
ip route add 192.168.66.0/24 via 192.168.1.2 dev eth0:1
but when I connect to 192.168.66.0/24 network in connects still using
the IP of
Hi all
I need to use three 512 kbps aDSL internet connections, in a
load-sharing, link-failover scenario. Presently I am using Ipcop with a
single DSL. Now, I seem to have two options...one..an Edimax quad wan
port adsl router, with firewalling and NAT and second install a minimal
linux distro f
24 matches
Mail list logo
