Re: [LARTC] pfifo_fast priomap

On Thu, 2007-06-28 at 18:35 +0200, Roel van Meer wrote: > Hi list, > > I have a quick question about the priority mapping of tos bits. The manpage > of tc-prio shows a nice table with tos bits and the band they > are mapped to: > > TOS Bits MeansLinux PriorityBand >

[LARTC] pfifo_fast priomap

Hi list, I have a quick question about the priority mapping of tos bits. The manpage of tc-prio shows a nice table with tos bits and the band they are mapped to: TOS Bits MeansLinux PriorityBand 0x0 0

Re: [LARTC] Using Julian Anastasov's 'routes' patches on 2.4 kernel in conjunction with IPSec

On Tuesday 26 June 2007 00:40, Julian Anastasov wrote: > May be you have to replace your _updown script with one that > supports "ip route" and "ip rule" commands instead of the old "route" > tool. By this way you can use "ip rule ... from LNET to RNET" > to properly route traffic for the neg

[LARTC] HTB and ATM patch

Hi all, I patch my kernel (2.6.17) and my tc (iproute2-2.6.18-061002) utilitie for an accurate packet scheduling on an ATM link. I configure my HTB hierarchy on the upload of the link and try with differents flows. It works correctly but in some of case I lose about 50% of my bandwith. I use the

Re: [LARTC] Why does scp stall on low bandwidth connections?

Hello Andy, Thanks for the explanation one more time;-) Cheers, -Nikolay Andy Furniss wrote: > Nikolay Kichukov wrote: >> Hello Andy, >> unshaped here means with higher priority than the rest of the classes >> that have filters attached to them? > > Yes it will just be passed and not be accounte