Re: [LARTC] Is ESFQ working?

identical if i use classify or mark, however, i > expected this, because the packets do go to the right classes, it's > just it looks that ESFQ is not assuring fairness between users Which version of ESFQ? Patch for 2.6.15.1 or 2.6.19.2? Bests, Tomasz Chilinski. _

Re: [LARTC] Is ESFQ working?

$ANADIR -d 192.168.20.49 -j CLASSIFY --set-class 1:700 > > [cut] Have u tried to replace CLASSIFY target by MARK target and then using fw filter? I have got bad experience with CLASSIFY target. Bests, Tomasz Chilinski. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] Is ESFQ working?

for someone? > > żShould i go for imq for this kind of shaping? Can you show a snippet of your script here? Bests, Tomasz Chilinski. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] 2.6.17 kernels and equalize patch

patch. Are you sure equalize patch is needed for 2.4? > -- > Luciano Bests, Tomasz Chilinski. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

RE: [LARTC] IPP2P Problem

On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:33:17 +1300, Rangi Biddle wrote > Hi Tomasz, Hi Rangi. > Thank you for the reply. > > I have checked the Makefile and unfortunately it is using the respective > gcc. Output of Makefile below: > > libipt_ipp2p.so: libipt_ipp2p.c ipt_ipp2p.h > $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(IPT

Re: [LARTC] IPP2P Problem

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:26:18 +1300, Rangi Biddle wrote > Hi Guys, Hi Rangi. > I am currently using linux kernel 2.6.18.6 + l7filter patch, > iptables 1.3.7 and have managed to compile the ipp2p shared object > which is now sitting in /lib/iptables. > > However when I run the following I get th

RE: [LARTC] HFSC Advanced Limiting

ork+ Certified > Network and Systems Administrator > Great Lakes Internet, Inc. > 112 North Howard > Croswell, MI 48422 > 810-679-3395 > -- Kind regards, Tomasz Chilinski RHCX, RHCE, RedHat Academy Instructor Cisco Certified Academy Instructor LMS developer: http://lms.rulez.pl Kadu

RE: [LARTC] HFSC Advanced Limiting

d Wireless Network Administrator > Cisco Certified Network Associate > CompTIA Security+ Certified > CompTIA Network+ Certified > Network and Systems Administrator > Great Lakes Internet, Inc. > 112 North Howard > Croswell, MI 48422 > 810-679-3395 -- Kind regards, Toma

Re: [LARTC] same gw / load balancing

n how to deal with this in the simplest > manner? (first time with this topic for me). Try to use nth match and connmark match and target from netfilter.org patch-o-matic. > Guillermo -- Kind regards, Tomasz Chilinski ___ LARTC mailing list

Re: [LARTC] mark

> > tried to "patch-o-matic" with connmark and didnot work out (kernel > 2.6.9)... .. it works ok with 2.4.x It works for me with 2.4.x too. I didnt tried with 2.6.x. -- Kind regards, Tomasz Chilinski ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAI

Re: [LARTC] Limit traffic that use to download a file

Someone wants connbytes and connmark at the same time? Here you have it again: http://www.chilan.com/pom-ng-connmarkbytes.tar.bz2 > Andy. -- Kind regards, Tomasz Chilinski ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/

Re: [LARTC] is round-robin on interface aliases possible?

two route tables. This way you can get load balancing for ip dialogues. -- Kind regards, Tomasz Chilinski ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth Metering

o parse your webserver log files. But I guess > you already know that. This is not good solution cause of high load where you account many nets and/or hosts. In my opinion ACCOUNT/account from netfilter.org patch-o-matic-ng are the best solutions for mass accounting. Bests, T

Re: [LARTC] CONNMARK problem

normal. CONNMARK target doesn't mean stopping traversing the chain. > Matis Bests, Tomasz Chilinski ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] masquerade and mac problem

g filter/FORWARD hook mac field in skb structure is not valid, because packet is beeing forwarded between two ifaces. > Bests, > Sorin Bests, Tomasz Chilinski __

Re: [LARTC] masquerade and mac problem

$ipt -A POSTROUTING -t nat -s 192.168.10.5 -j MASQUERADE > $ipt -A POSTROUTING -t nat -s 192.168.10.6 -j MASQUERADE > > #$ipt -P FORWARD DROP > Use mac source match in chain PREROUTING of nat table. Additionalny tests will be working for first packets of connecti

[LARTC] connmark+connbytes

Hello! Maybe someone needs connmark and connbytes working together? See attached file compatible with pom-ng-20040621 (I called it connmarkbytes :)). Kind Regards, Tomasz Chilinski pom-ng-connmarkbytes.tar.bz2 Description: application/tbz