On 01/16/07 04:01, Andrew Lyon wrote:
Can you suggest how this can be done with 2.6 as we will be upgrading our
server soon and I don't think ECMP patch exists for 2.6?
The patch does not exist because ECMP is in the main line kernel.
Networking ->
Networking options ->
IP: advanced r
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 06:44:54PM -0600, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 01/15/07 15:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Wow, that's a complicated solution. Nicely done:) But I think that's a
> >bit too complicated for my setup thx for the input anyway.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Indeed the set up is not simple.
On 01/15/07 15:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, that's a complicated solution. Nicely done:) But I think that's a
bit too complicated for my setup thx for the input anyway.
Thanks.
Indeed the set up is not simple. You may consider talking with your ISP
and seeing if they can assign one
On 01/13/07 05:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both links have their own ip but have the same gateway. The problem is I
can't seem to get egress traffic load balanced over the 2 nics.
I don't know if it is still a problem or not, but I ran in to something
very similar a LONG time ago (mid 2.4).
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:54:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a linux server running kernel 2.6.19 that is connected with 2
> seperate 100Mbit links to the same isp:
>
>
> +---+
> +---+ | I |
Hi,
I have a linux server running kernel 2.6.19 that is connected with 2
seperate 100Mbit links to the same isp:
+---+
+---+ | I |
+---+
| | | S |
