On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Dmitry Boyarintsev
skalogryz.li...@gmail.com wrote:
If you want to adjust paragraph attributes for the current selection only
then you can subclass RichMemo (or CustomRichMemo) and add delphi RichEdit
compatible properties, that would use existing RichMemo
Congratulations.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
You can joke or you can implement RichEdit on Windows. The choice is yours.
See lzRichEdit implementation.
I see what you mean now.
If you want to adjust paragraph attributes for the current selection only
then you can
On 11/11/2014 20:36, Antônio wrote:
I don't say about copy/paste code, I refer to a person who could say to
the two that we need to implement RichEdit in LCL.
The two? I don't really understand what you mean there. In fact, I
have trouble understanding how this is a reply to my post. If
I guess that license would not be a problema to Elson Junio. But maybe he
uses the wrong license, I don't know.
The two? I don't really understand what you mean there.
Dimitry and Elson.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 12/11/2014 13:23, Antônio wrote:
I guess that license would not be a problema to Elson Junio. But maybe
he uses the wrong license, I don't know.
Mmm well, I tried to explain in my forum posts and this mail thread...
The two? I don't really understand what you mean there.
Dimitry and
What could I do to solve the license problem?
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 12/11/2014 13:34, Antônio wrote:
What could I do to solve the license problem?
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,26425.msg162338.html#msg162338
So apparently the information in the .lpk file and the pas files is
conflicting:
lpk file: LGPL
pas file (text on wiki):
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:34:48 -0200
Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
What could I do to solve the license problem?
Ask the authors for permission to publish the code under modified LGPL2.
Mattias
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Ask the authors for permission to publish the code under modified LGPL2.
Sure, I will do it.
Antõnio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Where to find a copy of modified LGPL2?
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:53:05 -0200
Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
Where to find a copy of modified LGPL2?
COPYING.modifiedLGPL.txt and COPYING.LGPL.txt.
Mattias
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
So the exact line in LPK file should be this?
License Value=modified LGPL/
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Well, done. The author agrees and the package will be modified.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Thanks Mattias and Reinier for the help.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 10/11/2014 22:24, Antônio wrote:
You can joke or you can implement RichEdit on Windows. The choice is yours.
See lzRichEdit implementation.
Was that the one with the uncertain copyright/legal status?
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 10/11/14 20:27, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014-11-09 12:27 GMT+01:00 Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com
mailto:antoniog12...@gmail.com:
Sorry for the big message, Gnail hides me the rest of the message.
After clicking on the answer button, press Down twice (which
selects the
Copyrighted by Elson Junio with LGPL.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
I am deleting the whole text which Gmail putted below this. I don't know
how it arrives to you, but it is what I am doing.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
I have just created the wiki page:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/lzRichEdit
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 11/11/2014 13:20, Antônio wrote:
Copyrighted by Elson Junio with LGPL.
Antônio
Ah, so it cannot be used directly in Lazarus as it isn't LGPL with
linking exception.
See also
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23383
where at that time certain parts of the code were marked GPL.
--
Yes, this is the component. Maybe the author can change the license if you
put it on Lazarus. Something to check.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Sorry, see by yourself:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/lzRichEdit#License
Antõnio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:39:51 +0100
Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/11/2014 13:20, Antônio wrote:
Copyrighted by Elson Junio with LGPL.
Antônio
Ah, so it cannot be used directly in Lazarus as it isn't LGPL with
linking exception.
The linking exception is to
It arrives exactly like you wrote it.
But it's not good enough: no need to delete ALL previous message,
JUST the not-important bits,
AND start writing response BELOW them and inline.
(screen reader exception applies, but then, would a screen reader work on GMail
?).
el es
(how was this now
Yes, thanks.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 11/11/2014 17:52, Antônio wrote:
Sorry, see by yourself:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/lzRichEdit#License
As I posted on the forum:
http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,26425.0.html
lzrichedit.zip does not mention license in readme or in doc folder.
In the .lpk package, it
On 11/11/2014 17:53, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The linking exception is to allow to use the LCL in a non (L)GPL
application. Without it you can still use it in (L)GPL applications.
For example the IDE.
Yes, you're right. I did mean the LCL... because that seems like the
only obvious place such a
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:11:53 +0100
Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/11/2014 17:53, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The linking exception is to allow to use the LCL in a non (L)GPL
application. Without it you can still use it in (L)GPL applications.
For example the IDE.
Well, it seems that we have RichMemo, which does not work on Windows, and
lzRichEdit which works only on 2 platforms. Maybe someone can merge them
and implement a Lazarus.RichEdit.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
For 3 platforms.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Oh if you want to nitpick... In my initial post I talked about
using/copying the code Into the LCL obviously.
And no I did not say the component should go into the LCL /now/
(nitpicking myself here)
I just wanted to warn people to not copy paste code.
--
I don't say about copy/paste code, I refer to a person who could say to the
two that we need to implement RichEdit in LCL.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it seems that we have RichMemo, which does not work on Windows
Oh snap! These are loud words.
Please bug report what exactly doesn't work.
Thanks,
Dmitry
--
___
Lazarus
I could not install RichMemo other than 3703 revision because the code does
not compile and/or does not install (I can not understand that). So I could
not find any bug you would consider relevant.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
I could not install RichMemo other than 3703 revision because the code
does not compile and/or does not install (I can not understand that).
What revisions did you try and what was the error message? Is it true that
r3703
I could not remember.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Hello Antonio
Please note that Undo is part of the WSCustomMemo, thus it should not be
reintroduced in RichMemo.
Other attributes getting methods are just duplicates of the existing
method GetTextAttribute. Sorry - not acceptable. .
thanks,
Dmitry
--
GetTextAttribute depends on SelStart and it causes errors.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
GetTextAttribute depends on SelStart and it causes errors.
GetTextAttributes accepts start/end of the text. Which can be different
than SelStart value.
thanks,
Dmitry
--
___
Windows RichEdit messages refer to selection, you don't need to refer to
text range.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
Windows RichEdit messages refer to selection, you don't need to refer to
text range.
Windows specific implementation has no effect on the interface of RichMemo.
However, if there's a glitch in the Windows implementation
Of course I could not see your implementation because I could not install
any other version than 3703 revision.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Does RichMemo work fine in Linux?
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
Does RichMemo work fine in Linux?
It does work fine to a certain extent.
thanks,
Dmitry
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Why not to implement it on Windows in a way it works fine on this OS?
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not to implement it on Windows in a way it works fine on this OS?
Gtk development team failed to copy WinAPI obviously.
But to be more serious, Gtk doesn't provide RTF native reading.
thanks,
Dmitry
--
You can joke or you can implement RichEdit on Windows. The choice is yours.
See lzRichEdit implementation.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On 11/10/2014 3:27 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014-11-09 12:27 GMT+01:00 Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com:
Sorry for the big message, Gnail hides me the rest of the message.
After clicking on the answer button, press Down twice (which selects the
ellipsis) then press Enter and voilà,
Sorry for the big message, Gnail hides me the rest of the message.
The control is TRichMemo.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
I have already said, I think:
function WSRegisterCustomX: Boolean; external name 'WSRegisterCustomX';
{...}
class procedure TCustomX.WSRegisterClass;
begin
inherited;
WSRegisterCustomX;
end;
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
The control is TRichMemo.
Hello Antônio
Need to be noted that RichMemo is not part of standard LCL but a separate
package.
Thus it has its own set of register process.
See richmemofactory.pas. This is the place where the
Hi, Dimitry
So what the hell do class procedure TCustomRichMemo.WSRegisterClass?
Thanks,
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
I know it is called.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
So what the hell do class procedure TCustomRichMemo.WSRegisterClass?
It associates the LCL TCustomRichMemo with a certain WS-handler class.
That's necessary at the time TRichMemo is allocated by LCL it would receive
a
Antônio
I can only guess that the changes you're talking about were reported here:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=27009
From the changes I can see noted there, they're done not quite accurate
manner.
For example, Windows specific code is moved to TWSCustomRichMemo class
(WSRichMemo.pas).
Forget what I wrote on that bugreport. Now I have added to
TWin32WSCustomRichMemo.
class function TWin32WSCustomRichMemo.GetColor(const AWinControl:
TWinControl) :TColor;
begin
SayHello; // this fails
end;
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Before this I have added an empty clone method in WSRichMemo.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
In fact the method name is GetSelectionColor, which is not coincident with
any other method you could have written before.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
In fact the method name is GetSelectionColor, which is not coincident with
any other method you could have written before.
So let's trade.
You share your code, I share the knowledge of what is wrong with it.
thanks,
Dmitry
Should I post the files here:?
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
Should I post the files here:?
You could post the diff file here or you could attach it to the bug report
you've already created.
thanks,
Dmitry
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Done in the bug report.
Thanks.
Antônio
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Correct me if I am wrong.
Now I know that TWn32WSCustomX classes are linked at runtime to TWSCustomX
class procedures and functions, which are empty.
My problem is that one of these functions does not result, I don't know
why. (I have already written some procedures that return, but now one of
The class name is TWin32WSCustomX and the problem is about a function which
does not result. Any limit? Any restriction?
2014-11-08 11:00 GMT-02:00 Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com:
Correct me if I am wrong.
Now I know that TWn32WSCustomX classes are linked at runtime to TWSCustomX
class
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 11:04:45 -0200
Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
The class name is TWin32WSCustomX and the problem is about a function which
does not result. Any limit? Any restriction?
2014-11-08 11:00 GMT-02:00 Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com:
Correct me if I am wrong.
Now
Yes.
2014-11-08 11:22 GMT-02:00 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 11:04:45 -0200
Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
The class name is TWin32WSCustomX and the problem is about a function
which
does not result. Any limit? Any restriction?
2014-11-08
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 11:27:22 -0200
Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Do you mean the TWSCustomX.AMethod is called, but your
TWin32WSCustomX.AMethod is not called?
Yes
Is RegisterWSComponent(TWSCustomX,TWin32WSCustomX) called?
Mattias
--
class procedure TCustomX.WSRegisterClass;
begin
inherited;
WSRegisterCustomX;
end;
2014-11-08 12:47 GMT-02:00 Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com:
function WSRegisterCustomX: Boolean; external name 'WSRegisterCustomX';
Where it should be called?
Antônio
2014-11-08 12:10 GMT-02:00 Mattias
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 12:49:58 -0200
Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com wrote:
class procedure TCustomX.WSRegisterClass;
begin
Where it should be called? In what method?
Antônio
2014-11-08 14:37 GMT-02:00 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in
Well, now I understand what you mean. Yes, it is called.
Antônio
2014-11-08 14:57 GMT-02:00 Antônio antoniog12...@gmail.com:
Where it should be called? In what method?
Antônio
2014-11-08 14:37 GMT-02:00 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
A: Because it messes up the order in
function WSRegisterCustomX: Boolean; external name 'WSRegisterCustomX';
{...}
class procedure TCustomX.WSRegisterClass;
begin
inherited;
WSRegisterCustomX;
end;
Antônio
2014-11-08 22:07 GMT-02:00 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
A: Because it messes up the order in which
Is this control really called X? What does it do? And why does it
need a WS implementation, it will go to Lazarus sources?
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
74 matches
Mail list logo
