Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy (Families) program for iPhone

2010-08-17 Thread hwedhlor
Hi Graham, Sorry to hear of your frustrations in obtaining the Families app, and getting it running. Families is not a product of Millennium, nor is it associated with their Legacy Family Tree product other than it was designed to synchronize data with Legacy. Families is a product of TelGen,

[LegacyUG] Any way to move pictures to event?

2010-08-17 Thread David Baker
I have most of my documents such as birth, death & marriage certificates just attached to the individual. Now that I am getting more familiar with Legacy I realise that is wrong and I should have these photos attached to the events (vital events?) instead. Is there any easy way (in Picture Centre f

[LegacyUG] Legacy (Families) program for iPhone

2010-08-17 Thread Graham
Hello all, and am I the only one having trouble with the Legacy "Families" program? Maybe I've done it wrong, but I have just gone through many hours of the most convoluted downloading procedure I have ever encounted. For starters, I received an email which stated "Use this coupon for 10% off you

Re: [LegacyUG] information from other online trees

2010-08-17 Thread Ron Ferguson
You are not on your own, Sherry, I too have had a very poor response (if any) when I have tried to contact owners of Rootsweb and Ancestry sites. At one time I used them for fishing trips (even then I didn't trust the information), but now I only look if a link crops up when I am looking for someth

Re: [LegacyUG] Date question

2010-08-17 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
To correct a possible misunderstanding. People (me included) reccommend not putting Unknown into name fields. Since the program autofills empty fields on the screen, I prefer the printouts to have a blank area to eventually write in, when data is found, instead of crossing out unknown on the pri

Re: [LegacyUG] information from other online trees

2010-08-17 Thread Sherry/Support
No it was always with my personal email address just like anyone else looking for more info on a web posting! Sincerely, Sherry Technical Support Legacy Family Tree On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote: > I'm wondering if the person might not have felt intimidated especial

Re: [LegacyUG] Date question

2010-08-17 Thread Kathy Meyer
that is helpful, thank you. On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Brian L. Lightfoot < br...@the-lightfoots.com> wrote: > More about Dates.. > > I thought that the only permissible word in a Legacy date field was the > word "unknown". Until I found this little gem in the Legacy Help File: > >

RE: [LegacyUG] information from other online trees

2010-08-17 Thread Brian L. Lightfoot
I'm wondering if the person might not have felt intimidated especially if your email gave any sort of reference to a tie with Legacy or Millennia Corp? I could understand where they might just want to ignore you under those circumstances. But as I stated before, there are many people out there t

RE: [LegacyUG] Date question

2010-08-17 Thread Brian L. Lightfoot
More about Dates.. I thought that the only permissible word in a Legacy date field was the word "unknown". Until I found this little gem in the Legacy Help File: "You can also enter the following words into any date field: dead, deceased, child, infant, stillborn and young." Huh?

Re: [LegacyUG] Date question

2010-08-17 Thread Eliz Hanebury
I have tons of those, and Legacy lets me do after (date) and before (date) when all the dates are from a Will, being written and dated and being probated. Eliz On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:53 AM, BMcL Robinson wrote: > HI Ron > > What about "after 21 Feb 1942" if you can't commit to an end date?

Re: [LegacyUG] information from other online trees

2010-08-17 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
Understood --- On Tue, 8/17/10, Sherry/Support wrote: > From: Sherry/Support > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] information from other online trees > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Date: Tuesday, August 17, 2010, 11:25 AM > If they were, I would expect a bounce > message.  Not getting any > bounc

Re: [LegacyUG] information from other online trees

2010-08-17 Thread Sherry/Support
If they were, I would expect a bounce message. Not getting any bounces from these people. Just silence. Sincerely, Sherry Technical Support Legacy Family Tree On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:50 AM, RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote: > In one instance, one person had borrowed my data, including unknown erro

RE: [LegacyUG] Date question

2010-08-17 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
I have many potential problems in my database. They include a priest stating a birth on Feb 30 (I forgot year). Once chosen, the PP 'accepts' the error, which is not mine, but a long dead person's. There seems to be an attitude that PP are always bad. If you want to use 'present', go ahead. Usin

Re: [LegacyUG] information from other online trees

2010-08-17 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
In one instance, one person had borrowed my data, including unknown errors, then died. His copies of my errors were still there the last time I looked. Some sites became 'owner' of the data, and wouldn't let me edit it. So the people you needed to contact may be dead already. Rich in LA CA ---

RE: [LegacyUG] Date question

2010-08-17 Thread Ronald E Howell
Thanks Brian and BMcL Robinson, Knowing that the problem was not with the date of '02/21/1942', but with the word 'present' or even 'current' (I had tested both and gotten the same BAD. I have opted for using the word 'From' in front of my date(s) with no '-' after that date. While it is not

Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file on a Kindle or other tablet device?

2010-08-17 Thread Leon Chapman
> > Bob: > Here is their URL: www.telgen.co.uk/families In the iTunes Store, search for Families Leon Chapman Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.co

RE: [LegacyUG] Date question

2010-08-17 Thread Brian L. Lightfoot
Maybe a little more explanation would be in order of why I said that "02/21/1942" has nothing wrong with it. Taken in context, the OP stated Legacy was marking "02/21/1942 - Present" as BAD. I stated that it was the word "Present" that caused Legacy to declare it BAD and not the entry of the dat

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with source reference formatting in PDF descendant book

2010-08-17 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:20:46 +0100, "Ron Ferguson" wrote: >Dennis has already drawn attention to a potential problem area with >Acrobat reader. Ron: I don't know if the problem involves how the Acrobat Reader renders the PDF for viewing, or how Legacy constructs the PDF. My guess would be the l

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with source reference formatting in PDF descendant book

2010-08-17 Thread Ron Ferguson
Brian, Why? Dennis has already drawn attention to a potential problem area with Acrobat reader. Ron Ferguson PS. If you wish everyone to read your posts, I suggest that you use Plain Text, rather than relying on others to change from your HTML

Re: [LegacyUG] information from other online trees

2010-08-17 Thread Sherry/Support
And I've written to *numerous* people who have posted trees, asking for more information (usually to confirm a source because their info differs from mine) and have *never* received a response! Sincerely, Sherry Technical Support Legacy Family Tree On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Kirsten Bow

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with source reference formatting in PDF descendant book

2010-08-17 Thread john . woods
Great idea, didn't think of that. The defaults worked nicely so I'd stuck with them. In fact, simply by changing the font size from 10 to 11 I've vastly improved it. I'll keep playing with that option. Thanks. Re the Acrobat Reader version suggestion, I feel it's very unlikely to be the reader t

Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy file on a Kindle or other tablet device?

2010-08-17 Thread Robert Runion
I'm interested in the Families program under discussion for use with an iPAD (planning on buying one, but need APP info). Can you direct me to a site that provides information on it? I did a few researches but could not come up with a web site to explain the program and its features? Is it avai

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with source reference formatting in PDF descendant book

2010-08-17 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:03:05 +0100, "Ron Ferguson" wrote: >Sorry, John, but I cannot repeat your problem either. I created a small >Ancestor Report with the Sources at the bottom of each page and created the >PDF using the Legacy Option. > >My Reader is version 9.3.3.177. > >Have you considered t

Re: [LegacyUG] Date question

2010-08-17 Thread BMcL Robinson
HI Ron What about "after 21 Feb 1942" if you can't commit to an end date? Cheers, Brett BMcL Robinson, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand - Original Message - From: "Ronald E Howell" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 1:34 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] Date question I have several events (i.e. Occu

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with source reference formatting in PDF descendant book

2010-08-17 Thread Ron Ferguson
Sorry, John, but I cannot repeat your problem either. I created a small Ancestor Report with the Sources at the bottom of each page and created the PDF using the Legacy Option. My Reader is version 9.3.3.177. Have you considered that the problem may be with Acrobat Reader, and tried reinstalling

[LegacyUG] Problem with source reference formatting in PDF descendant book

2010-08-17 Thread john . woods
'm having trouble with the positioning of the source reference number in the pdf version of a descendant book. It displays correctly at the end of the sentence in Legacy but when I create a pdf from it the number shifts left and overlaps the text. This makes both the number and the last bit of te