Re: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees

2013-11-15 Thread Paula Ryburn
Chuck,  Search > Miscellaneous > Direct line ancestors with no parents will give you the "top ends of the branches" for all your ancestor branches - which I think is the same as your "home" ?  --Paula in Texas Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman Clement

Re: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees

2013-10-26 Thread singhals
Chuck Sechler wrote: > I have an ancestor I have done a tree for with Legacy and I > followed only male lines down. If a female married into > another family name, the tree stopped for her line. so, I > have one “origin”, the first person I have recorded in my > family. But, if I were to follow

Re: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees

2013-10-26 Thread Chuck Sechler
3 8:49 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees Chuck, I am not at all clear as to what you mean when referring to the female tree. This may be because I tend to think in terms of mtDNA when considering a female tree. In my scenario the female line

RE: [LegacyUG] Design question on trees

2013-10-26 Thread Ron Ferguson
Chuck, I am not at all clear as to what you mean when referring to the female tree. This may be because I tend to think in terms of mtDNA when considering a female tree. In my scenario the female line is always passed from mother to daughter down the line. Which is why I cannot see why you swi