Peter Miller schrieb:
>> Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A really quick poll
>>
>> Closing the poll.
>>
>> The results look like this:
>>
>> Place no restrictions whatsoever on the use of the map data (Use a
>> Public Domain license)
>> 41.1%76
>> Ensure that users of the data contribu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joseph Gentle schrieb:
> Please fill out this poll:
>
> http://sineltor.selfip.org/osm.php
>
>
> Thanks!
> Joseph
>
- - Don't we have Legal-general for stuff like this now?
- - More options would be nice. Having to choose between the current
opti
Rob Myers schrieb:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> One of the main problems with sharealike/copyleft is the large number of
>> incompatible licenses. I suggest explicitly adding some important such
>> license
One of the main problems with sharealike/copyleft is the large number of
incompatible licenses. I suggest explicitly adding some important such
licenses to 4.4 iii, so we don't lock too many other free communities
out from using OSM data.
At least the most common ones like GPLv2 or later, LGPL, GF
Rob Myers schrieb:
> Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
>
>> Copyleft/share-alike seemed like a good idea to me for a long time.
>> However the large number of incompatible licenses like GPLv2 only,
>> GPLv3, CC-BY-SA fragment the free software/data/etc community and
>>
Rob Myers schrieb:
> The trend is toward unifying copyleft licences, with FDL/BY-SA
> compatibility still on the cards, GPL3 being more compatible with other
> licences, and OSI committed to preventing further licence proliferation.
Will the new SA license be compatible with other free licenses? M
A Morris schrieb:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Joseph Gentle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Some people have different ideas of what 'free' should mean for our maps.
>>
>> Do you prefer that we:
>> (o) Place no restrictions on the use of the map data [link to PD stuff]
>> (o) Force anyone u
Joseph Gentle schrieb:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:06 PM, 80n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I like so view OSM as a cool DIY project, not a political trick we're
>>> pulling.
>> The problem with PD is that it permits companies to take OSM data, add their
>> own data and benefit from result withou
