On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 02:55:50PM -0600, Douglas R. Reno via lfs-dev wrote:
>
> On 2/24/21 12:13 PM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:48:05AM +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev
> > > wrote:
On 2/24/21 12:13 PM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:48:05AM +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
I see that people have been
On 2/24/21 12:13 PM, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:48:05AM +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
I see that people have been b
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 03:48:05AM +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> > > I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been
> > > of
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:31:12AM +0100, Pierre Labastie via lfs-dev wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> > I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been
> > offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0.
> >
> > Technically, the JS build doe
On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 02:02 +, Ken Moffat via lfs-dev wrote:
> I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been
> offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0.
>
> Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security
> fixes, just one or two lines of python got chang
I see that people have been busy tagging things whilst I've been
offline. One of those things is JS-78.8.0.
Technically, the JS build does not appear to contain any security
fixes, just one or two lines of python got changed. But
firefox-78.8.0 does contain the usual crop of fixes rated as 'high
