On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 01:47:16PM +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >Martin Storsjö writes:
> >>On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> >>
> >>>POSIX says this about option syntax:
> >>>
> >>> If the SYNOPSIS of a standard utility shows an option with
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Martin Storsjö writes:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Mans Rullgard wrote:
POSIX says this about option syntax:
If the SYNOPSIS of a standard utility shows an option with a
mandatory option-argument, a conforming application shall use
separate arguments f
Martin Storsjö writes:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>
>> POSIX says this about option syntax:
>>
>> If the SYNOPSIS of a standard utility shows an option with a
>> mandatory option-argument, a conforming application shall use
>> separate arguments for that option and its option-
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Mans Rullgard wrote:
POSIX says this about option syntax:
If the SYNOPSIS of a standard utility shows an option with a
mandatory option-argument, a conforming application shall use
separate arguments for that option and its option-argument.
However, a conforming impleme
POSIX says this about option syntax:
If the SYNOPSIS of a standard utility shows an option with a
mandatory option-argument, a conforming application shall use
separate arguments for that option and its option-argument.
However, a conforming implementation shall also permit applications
