On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:46:19PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 10/15/2012 05:11 AM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> > Some compilers (e.g. old gcc) have trouble with these.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard
> > ---
> > libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c | 17 +
> > 1 file changed, 9 ins
On 10/15/2012 05:11 AM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> Some compilers (e.g. old gcc) have trouble with these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard
> ---
> libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c | 17 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
It makes the code a bit easier to follow, ple
On 10/15/2012 05:53 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>> Some compilers (e.g. old gcc) have trouble with these.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard
>> ---
>> libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c | 17 +
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+),
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> Some compilers (e.g. old gcc) have trouble with these.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard
> ---
> libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c | 17 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libswscale/swscale_unsc
Some compilers (e.g. old gcc) have trouble with these.
Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard
---
libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c b/libswscale/swscale_unscaled.c
index 70eff72..5efc647 100644