Michael insists that we post his reply to our decision to the list, so
we do so below. We already responded to his message off list.
Best,
Yosem
From: Michael Allan m...@zelea.com
Date: Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:40 PM
Yosem,
May I briefly speak in reply? I will not be joining the admin
Brian and Elijah,
Brian said:
If Stanford University, who currently hosts the libtech mailng list
decides to change the setup in contravention of democratic process
of the list MEMBERS, then I would hope list members will move to one
of many other options for hosting. ... Is it not worth
3 lines summary of what follows:
There is NO way that the list admin can prevent list members from
putting in danger other people who ask for help to the list, so stop
worrying too much about this and don't mess anymore with the headers.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 23:45:47 PM -0400, Michael Allan
I would suggest if you don't accept the decision of the list members to
keep reply-to-list, you should not subscribe. It seems silly to raise it
again and attempt to appeal to higher authorities that have much better
things on which to spend their time than mediate disputes about mailing
list
To the experts in Liberationtech, Air-L and Mailman lists,
(cc General Counsel of Stanford University)
Stanford University has configured the Liberationtech mailing list in
a manner that is potentially unsafe. University staff are aware of
the problem and are evalutating the situation, but have
