Re: [Libevent-users] patch for "realtime signal" events in libevent-1.4.3-stable

2008-05-15 Thread Phil Budne
on Thu, 15 May 2008 Nick Mathewson wrote: > Out of curiousity, how did the benchmarks turn out? Any reason to try > to get rtsig working again in the mainline distribution? > > Nick On Fedora 8 (2.6.24.5-85.fc8), the results were consistantly a little worse than epoll. I didn't check whether the

Re: [Libevent-users] patch for "realtime signal" events in libevent-1.4.3-stable

2008-05-15 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 05:39:51PM -0400, Phil Budne wrote: > I needed to do apples-to-apples comparison between rtsignals and epoll > for a client, so I fixed rtsig.c from 1.3e (see an earlier post) to > compile, then fixed it to work, and ported that to 1.4.3-stable. > > NOTE WELL! Used only for

[Libevent-users] patch for "realtime signal" events in libevent-1.4.3-stable

2008-05-12 Thread Phil Budne
I needed to do apples-to-apples comparison between rtsignals and epoll for a client, so I fixed rtsig.c from 1.3e (see an earlier post) to compile, then fixed it to work, and ported that to 1.4.3-stable. NOTE WELL! Used only for benchmarking: the rtsig_dealloc routine may not free everything it ne