Pushed up to 0011
Christina
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
-This email and the patch follow the provisions of GPL 3.
hi,i modified the code of libreoffice to access the file in disk,mainly in
sot module and the speed for libreoffice to open a ppt file from disk is
25% faster.
My computer :
cpu:unicore-2 600Mhz,mem:1GB.DDR2
The main change:
Hello there,
I've seen quite often something like this:
-/*
- #i2345#
- if ( nSlotId >= SID_SFX_START && !SfxMenuManager::IsPopupFunction(nSlotId)
)
- {
- // Echte Popups sollen keine SlotIds haben; leider sind
- // da noch Altlasten mit herumzuschleppen ...
- String aTitle = pSVMenu->GetItemText
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 10:33 +0100, Xavier ALT wrote:
> second patch.
Also looks good, pushed, thanks for this.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 18:20 +0100, Xavier ALT wrote:
> Le 06/03/2011 10:31, Xavier ALT a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch series fix make the color palette size consistent everywhere.
> > Related to bug fdo#34896
> > (https://bugs.freedesktop.org//show_bug.cgi?id=34896)
Looks good to me, pushe
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 08:37:29PM +0300, Osama Khalid wrote:
> I tried to find a binary build for the Java Runtime Environment for
> Windows so I can distribute and install it freely but I couldn't.
AFAIK, you can't distribute it freely, the license forbids it.
> Several components of LibreOffic
I tried to find a binary build for the Java Runtime Environment for
Windows so I can distribute and install it freely but I couldn't.
Several components of LibreOffice depend on JRE and I encounter many
warning message boxes on start up without it, so I it's important to
make sure that a free vers
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Pantelis Koukousoulas
wrote:
> According to further discussion with Simos, it seems that
> because the patch implements a new feature, a bug should
> be opened first.
>
> So, here is the bug
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35218
> with the patch att
Yes - 0001 - 0003 are pushed as I wrote yesterday. I'll continue as time
permits.
Christina Rossmanith
Am 11.03.2011 17:20, schrieb Kayo Hamid:
just to remember: some patchs translating german comments to english
are not pushed, 0044 is one and we have others inside this list of
patchs.
rev
Le 11/03/11 17:28, Norbert Thiebaud a écrit :
Hi Norbert,
> Humm correction. the patches now apply but the build still fail...
> there is an expeort of U_CC that doesn't paly well with the CC having
> spaces in it (for me it is "ccache gcc-4.0")
>
> Norbert
>
Ah, that might explain why my own
According to further discussion with Simos, it seems that
because the patch implements a new feature, a bug should
be opened first.
So, here is the bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35218
with the patch attached.
In my view, the patch is ready to merge (license LGPLv3/MPL
is added
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 09:46 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> Looks like a icu4c-aix.patch, unsurprisingly ;-), does not apply anymore
>
> I think I fixed that patch earlier. Though there seems to be another
> problem on mac as well.
just to remember: some patchs translating german comments to english
are not pushed, 0044 is one and we have others inside this list of
patchs.
revol_
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 09:46 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> Looks like a icu4c-aix.patch, unsurprisingly ;-), does not apply anymore
>
> I think I fixed that patch earlier. Though there seems to be another
> problem on mac as well.
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 09:46 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> Looks like a icu4c-aix.patch, unsurprisingly ;-), does not apply anymore
I think I fixed that patch earlier. Though there seems to be another
problem on mac as well.
We also however a tricky windows problem, we munge the .vcproj fi
c5ac0683e2930ac51b59affbaf35d0c1b73a1dc8 is the first bad commit
commit c5ac0683e2930ac51b59affbaf35d0c1b73a1dc8
Author: Martin Hosken
Date: Fri Mar 4 19:55:17 2011 +0700
Upgrade to ICU 4.6
:04 04 acdefc5204f7c0049aef9442c773f74efc9d4b2d
d6f35f4c4779fba378cb36a101925f75c3859909 M
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 10:01 -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 09:35 +, Tibby Lickle wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Kohei Yoshida
> > wrote:
> >
> > But before I commit your patches, we'd like to confirm that
> > you are
> >
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 18:07 +0300, Alexander wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I get problem when type/edit formulas in LO. Trouble in all version LO up to
> currently (3.3.2rc1).
> I use Debian.
>
> In OOo all Ok.
And what version of OOo ?, this might simply be having an older
opensymbol font installed somewh
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 09:35 +, Tibby Lickle wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Kohei Yoshida
> wrote:
>
> But before I commit your patches, we'd like to confirm that
> you are
> submitting your patches under LGPLv3+/MPL dual licenses.
>
> I knew I
Hi !
I get problem when type/edit formulas in LO. Trouble in all version LO up to
currently (3.3.2rc1).
I use Debian.
In OOo all Ok.
Screenshot:
http://radikal.ru/F/s46.radikal.ru/i111/1103/c3/7f1ecca20835.png.html
Some top-placed symbols (vector, widevec, widehat...) displayed as squares,
s
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Simos Xenitellis
wrote:
> Hi Pantelis,
>
> I tried recently to apply the original patch to LibreOffice, and did
> not apply cleanly.
Hi, the issue is just that some files have changed paths. This version of
the patch should apply to current git. I can also provide
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Pantelis Koukousoulas
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is a patch originally developed against openoffice in summer 2009
> that has not yet been accepted due to, in my opinion, purely bureocratic
> reasons / lack of interest from main devs
> (see http://openoffice.org/bugzil
Hi!
This is a patch originally developed against openoffice in summer 2009
that has not yet been accepted due to, in my opinion, purely bureocratic
reasons / lack of interest from main devs
(see http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91143 and particularly
the dates of comments) although i
Hi,
I have pushed all of your sfx2 changes except for sfx2-inc patch. It has
merge conflict changes - it would be great if you could fix and resend
it? Please do let me know if I have missed any other patch.
Thank you!
Muthu Subramanian
On 03/11/2011 02:49 PM, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
> Hi,
>
Attending:
+ Norbert, Andras, Thorsten, Caolan,
Kendy, Bjoern, Petr, Rene
* Previous Action items:
+ "writer useless in Japan" bug(s)
+ fixed as well as possible for now
+ magic fallback / Windows font needs some
love
Hi Bernhard,
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 22:11 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> At first I want to thank Sébastien not only for his work, but also for
> being open to the discussion here, even if this means to delay the final
> inclusion of his patch.
Agreed - we all think Sebastien rocks ;-)
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 15:58 +0100, Radek Doulík wrote:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-gui/commit/?id=1f4078d8be0755ea33ec36edacdf805e1ce24270
Looks good to me too.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant id
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> But before I commit your patches, we'd like to confirm that you are
> submitting your patches under LGPLv3+/MPL dual licenses.
>
I knew I'd forget something crucial - both are submitted under LGPLv3+/MPL.
> So, I'll retract my suggestio
Please ignore this patch for now, same-line changes have been made in
master since I sent this patch. I will merge it in my local repo and
resend the patch.
/Albert
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 20:51, Albert Thuswaldner
wrote:
> And now the actual patch
>
> /Albert
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 20:49,
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:45, Muthu Subramanian K wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> oh...Will have a look at those patches too...
> I assumed those were the ones you resent...Will get back to you in a while.
If you do manage to have a look on my other patches, please for now
ignore the first concerni
> Patch 4 only removes structuring
> "//---" lines. I'm not sure if this is wanted. Maybe
> someone of the experts can comment on this?
I would say yes, definitely. Vertical space is a non-renewable resource, as I
think Michael so nicely put it.
Such comments have no value
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34404
Rainer Bielefeld changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |All
CC|
32 matches
Mail list logo
