Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] convert xml2cmp to gbuild

On 09/13/2011 08:18 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 09/12/2011 11:23 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Peter Foley wrote: Another gbuild conversion. Nice. Pushed, Thanks. It ~looks like this broke the latest Mac OSX gcc-4.0.1 (PPC) tinderbox build, see

Re: [Libreoffice] 3.5 release from QA to point-zero

Hi Kohei, To start with your last remark ( "I'm very very confused. "): I do not want you guys to stop improving code, change thing for the better etc. On the contrary: I do applaud it. I know that you are aware of the risks of the necessary changes and do all that is reasonable to avoid it. I

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] convert xml2cmp to gbuild

On 09/12/2011 11:23 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Peter Foley wrote: Another gbuild conversion. Nice. Pushed, Thanks. It ~looks like this broke the latest Mac OSX gcc-4.0.1 (PPC) tinderbox build, see

[Libreoffice] (no subject)

The original message was received at Tue, 13 Sep 2011 12:32:29 +0700 from 35.150.96.253 - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to 139.165.184.241: 554 ... Message is too large 554 ... Service unavailable __

Re: [Libreoffice] 3.5 release from QA to point-zero

On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 00:23 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote: > > + always a trade-off between quality, community fun, > > pace of development (Michael) > >No real argument. I am more interested in the question: do we want >avoid another 3.4-style release? So, our memory

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] convert MathMLDTD to gbuild and add to tail_build

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 12.09.2011 23:26, Peter Foley wrote: >> >> gbuild conversion. >> >> Peter > > hi Peter, > > mostly looking good except: > >> --- a/Module_tail_build.mk >> +++ b/Module_tail_build.mk >> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ $(eval $(call gb_Module_add_moduledi

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

Michael Meeks wrote (08-09-11 17:28) + Release mgmt (Petr) + concern wrt. bugs in master - need some focus there + no more releases until after the conference A pity since 3.4.3 has at least one nasty regression. -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.or

Re: [Libreoffice] 3.5 release from QA to point-zero

Hi, from Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ... Michael Meeks wrote (08-09-11 17:28) + not too late to discuss at the conference and move freeze dates by a week or two (Norbert) If it is true that ... none of the devs have working of featur

Re: [Libreoffice] 3.5 release from QA to point-zero

Hi, [Please *first read my next mail* on this list !] Let me also reply on the minutes of tech. steering call: from Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ... Michael Meeks wrote (08-09-11 17:28) + Cor's considerations on release timing Better: time available between Be

[Libreoffice] additional symbols or alternatively stencils in Draw templates

Although I always try to convince people to use LibreOffice or OpenOffice before LB started there is one complaint coming back regularly. That is the missing capabilities of Draw compared to Visio. A first step in that direction would be offering more drawing symbols like a symbol set for BPMN.

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] convert MathMLDTD to gbuild and add to tail_build

On 12.09.2011 23:26, Peter Foley wrote: > > gbuild conversion. > > Peter hi Peter, mostly looking good except: > --- a/Module_tail_build.mk > +++ b/Module_tail_build.mk > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ $(eval $(call gb_Module_add_moduledirs,tail_end,\ > formula \ > hwpfilter \ > lotuswordpro

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] convert MathMLDTD to gbuild and add to tail_build

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > > gbuild conversion. Pushed with a little fix: a missing '\' in Module_tail_build.mk Thanks Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailm

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] convert MathMLDTD to gbuild and add to tail_build

gbuild conversion. PeterFrom 6bc7b647d1f116df04fcf43ce42db1d25ff0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Foley Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:19:42 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] convert MathMLDTD to gbuild and add to tail_build --- MathMLDTD/Makefile| 38 +++

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] convert xml2cmp to gbuild

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Peter Foley wrote: > > Another gbuild conversion. Nice. Pushed, Thanks. Norbert ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] convert xml2cmp to gbuild

Another gbuild conversion. Peter From 468dc3d5ce676ccd2aabf85540735086dccde7de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Foley Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:58:14 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] convert xml2cmp to gbuild --- Repository.mk|4 ++ RepositoryModule_ooo.mk |

[Libreoffice] From sal/cppunit.h to sal/precppunit.hxx

Hi all, With come three changes for CppUnit based tests in the LibO code base: - The header sal/cppunit.h has been removed (and it was not used much). - There is a new header sal/precppunit.hxx

Re: [Libreoffice] Mi first very little patch

@Lionel , What is the QuadPart member of the structure? The high part? the low part? or another thing? Thanks in advance :) . 2011/9/12 Lionel Elie Mamane > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:04:52PM +0200, CaStarCo wrote: > > I've created a second (very little too) patch to reduce the scope of a > > v

Re: [Libreoffice] Mi first very little patch

Thanks you very much :) , I'll take a look and try to make better patches. And, of course, all my patches will be licensed under MPL1.1/LGPLv3+ . ^_^ . ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/li

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild: filter module

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > see: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/AccountRequests > > Fill a bug and thy wish shall be granted :-) oh, I see that you already did https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40758 well, these are typically handled by mmeeks, and he i

[Libreoffice] Questions about gtk3 port

Hi, Today, I tried to work on the gtk3 port, for the widget rendering. But I have some problems... Let's take the button example. An easy way to draw a gtk3 button is to call gtk_render_frame (or background), with a cairo context. So, we can create the context using gdk_cairo_create. That's

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild: filter module

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: > hi all, > > i'm sitting on patches to convert the filter module to gbuild. > > these could land in a git repo near you soon if somebody gave me an fdo > account :) Michael, see: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/AccountRequests Fill a bug a

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Saturday 10 of September 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: >> >  Since there (AFAIR) haven't been any actual data presented in the >> > discussion >> >> here are some number for my linux bu

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix compilation in gtk3salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx

Yes, it is for the gtk3 feature branch, sorry, I forgot to mention it :/ On 09/12/2011 11:36 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 10:13 +0200, Lucas Baudin wrote: Hi, The small attached patch fixes the compilation in gtk3salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx, it's just a cast from long int to i

[Libreoffice] gbuild: filter module

hi all, i'm sitting on patches to convert the filter module to gbuild. these could land in a git repo near you soon if somebody gave me an fdo account :) because this is based on patches for ApacheOOo most of the new files have the standard ASF/AL2 license boilerplate. i'd like to leave that as

Re: [Libreoffice] helpful debugging writer cut and paste stuff

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:06:27PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > In this commit > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8cc839dc6ac3239bc4a3738cfb6078a8bf92ea72 > I added a ifdef-ed out dumper for the contents of the temporary > document, often rtf, used for cut and paste betw

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 37390, which changed state. Bug 37390 Summary: LibreOffice does not create valid ODF. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37390 What|Old Value |New Value

[Libreoffice] helpful debugging writer cut and paste stuff

In this commit http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8cc839dc6ac3239bc4a3738cfb6078a8bf92ea72 I added a ifdef-ed out dumper for the contents of the temporary document, often rtf, used for cut and paste between apps. Might be handy on occasion. Miklos: As an aside, is the "editeng

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Try to improve LibreOffice

Hello! I attached two patches (= 2 commits). Improvement: #39430 (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39430) Author: Dmitry Ashkadov License: LGPLv3/MPL Should I close bug #39430 ? 07.09.2011 18:10, Dmitry. A. Ashkadov пишет: Hello! Can I try to improve LibreOffice? I had found tas

Re: [Libreoffice] ccache support

On Saturday 10 of September 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > >  Since there (AFAIR) haven't been any actual data presented in the > > discussion > > here are some number for my linux buildbot. Ccache hit statistics from a buildbot is probably t

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 --- Comment #11 from huettem...@oceanwaves.de 2011-09-12 08:02:06 PDT --- I nominate Bug 35669 it really old but never the less very annoying. For complex Documents and Thesis it is important that the master document feature works again. https://b

[Libreoffice] licensing statement

hi all, licensing statement, valid until further notice: Any patches of which i'm the author that i send to the LibreOffice lists or commit to the LibreOffice repos are available under LGPLv3+/MPLv1.1 license unless explicitly noted otherwise, or, in case of newly added files, the license header

Re: [Libreoffice] Пожелания по программе.

I'm not an author of feature request. Should I add feature request to bug tracker? It seems, this request requires more details from author. 12.09.2011 15:02, Andras Timar пишет: Hello, 2011.09.12. 12:53 keltezéssel, Dmitry. A. Ashkadov írta: Hello! Should this letter be translated? No, i

Re: [Libreoffice] Small refactoring

On 09/12/2011 12:58 PM, Dmitry. A. Ashkadov wrote: I found many classes which have functions like «queryInterface», «acquire» and etc. implemented in a same way. Maybe is it better to introduce a new helper class? I can do it. There are already more than enough helper classes for that! See cp

Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice Digest, Vol 13, Issue 109

rpr6.cxx.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1305 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20110912/19940761/attachment.bin> -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:17:37 +0200 From: Bjoern Michaelsen Subject: Re: [Li

Re: [Libreoffice] Пожелания по программе.

Hello, 2011.09.12. 12:53 keltezéssel, Dmitry. A. Ashkadov írta: Hello! Should this letter be translated? No, it looks like a feature request. Please, either use bug tracker or tdf-discuss list for that. Thanks, Andras ___ LibreOffice mailing lis

[Libreoffice] Delivery reports about your e-mail

6œÌ1Úzw‰w©nò; 'OôcvVŸÜ¬K2“¼¶‹!‹<†A|܇cS¿¥Œs*q&ºŒØZÚ5¦[‘Ù-þb ÁgyN;ÏcKí‘2Y”¹je¦rµ_¦U®,µÊ¬câ(Š«KãuæWs2åÃü,ó144ÑwȄ†Ì©Žèðųæ80õ…ÞÝK»g\Óáó—9ŠÍ,«"H^¿<¶»÷ï!¬óa[‘i۔èþ£Â\ÐÌaà øü0æu¸o¦/ó»d ¥Ò©òZŒÜGØgjÁ^…ØÜõ/½#ºˆ Îì“^AxӜe}ááÚ¦¸#x¶žÍД1ÙiòhîVÎÕ熇ÎÛÚþçÀ§ñZÚÚL¾Ó 3ó.[ RçÞÀ/(ê¢Ö£ÜÛæ_ëÔeMz‘Hµ¾IóC¼:}Õ?‚âP‘&

[Libreoffice] Small refactoring

Hello! I found many classes which have functions like «queryInterface», «acquire» and etc. implemented in a same way. Maybe is it better to introduce a new helper class? I can do it. -- Best Regards, Dmitry <>___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreO

Re: [Libreoffice] Пожелания по программе.

Hello! Should this letter be translated? 12.09.2011 13:49, meb...@ya.ru пишет: Здравствуйте. Добавьте, пожалуйста, возможность вырезания строки (с удалением пустой строчки) и последующей вставки вырезанной строки в заданное место так, чтобы не надо было делать лишних действий по удалению очищ

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][Patch] fdo#40759 for X=0, GAMMADIST give wrong values

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Wolfgang Pechlaner wrote: > Hallo, > In the ODF 1.2 specification stand , that the GAMMADIST Function only for x > < 0  0 returns. The case x > 0 was ok, but there is the special case x == 0. > I've tried to implement this. Thanks, I've pushed it and updated bugzi

Re: [Libreoffice] stucked with a bug

On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 12:28 +0200, Dávid Vastag wrote: > The problem is that the width of the symbol on the open button is not > taken into account at calculation of overall button width. ... To > solve this issue I have to find a way somehow to extract dynamically > this symbol width information i

[Libreoffice] Пожелания по программе.

Здравствуйте. Добавьте, пожалуйста, возможность вырезания строки (с удалением пустой строчки) и последующей вставки вырезанной строки в заданное место так, чтобы не надо было делать лишних действий по удалению очищенной строки и добавлению строк перед вставкой вырезанной информации. Спасибо, Ан

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] cppcheck duplicateExpression

On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:38 -0700, julien2412 wrote: > Hello, > > Cppcheck has detected a duplicateExpression in > vcl/ios/source/window/salframe.cxx, line 470 > I checked on salframe.cxx of aqua, there's the same duplicate (line 631) > Here is the line : > if( pState->mnMask & (SAL_FRAMESTATE_MA

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][REVIEW] take two on the "where did my dictionaries go"

On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 15:47 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 13:52 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > Attached is the backport for 3-4 as this code changed a little between > > 3-4 and master. > > > > caolanm->Andras: could you arrange to have the attached tested ? > > https:/

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Fix configure to not require java packages when passed --without-java

On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:58 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > As requested in the fdo#40687 attaching the from the bug. Pushed now, thanks for this. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/list

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix compilation in gtk3salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx

On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 10:13 +0200, Lucas Baudin wrote: > Hi, > > The small attached patch fixes the compilation in > gtk3salnativewidgets-gtk.cxx, it's just a cast from long int to int. What's this patch against, that code doesn't exist in master. Is it against a gtk3 feature branch ? C. _

Re: [Libreoffice] How to get LVS spellchk dict into distribution

Hi, 2011/9/10 Jānis : > > the latest version, also found on openoffice extension site: > > http://dict.dv.lv/download/lv_LV-0.9.4.oxt > > Licence - LGPL > Integrated, thanks. Please notify us about future updates. Andras ___ LibreOffice mailing list Li

Re: [Libreoffice] SAL_DEPRECATED (was: [Libreoffice-commits] .: sal/inc)

On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:55:21 +0200 Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 09/09/2011 09:45 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > Is it true that __declspec must go before the return type for MSC > > (i.e., that the return type must go within the SAL_DEPRECATED > > argument)? No. > It turns out SAL_DEPRECATED c

[Libreoffice] [Patch] fdo#40759 for X=0, GAMMADIST give wrong values

Hallo, In the ODF 1.2 specification stand , that the GAMMADIST Function only for x < 0 0 returns. The case x > 0 was ok, but there is the special case x == 0. I've tried to implement this. greetings Wolfgang >From 6c45fe24805cf9eba135d3f28b0ddada35806cd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgan

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] some cleaning for Windows part - need a review

> based on some remarks, here exactly the same patches, but with improved > commit comments. Will be probably better to integrate these. Thanks, looked fine to me, committed and pushed. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.or

Re: [Libreoffice] git account request

+1. I would really like that too!!! -- Marc-André Laverdière Software Security Scientist Innovation Labs, Tata Consultancy Services Hyderabad, India On Mon 12 Sep 2011 02:37:20 AM IST, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Hi Marco > > Do you mind to write some lines on how you succeded to have the big > sou

Re: [Libreoffice] Experimental features

On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:02:07AM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > Does such a list exist ? > > Experimental features I know : > - macros recorder > - in-line formula editor > > Is there something else ? You can seach the code: http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=IsExperimentalMode&p

Re: [Libreoffice] Mi first very little patch

On 09/12/2011 01:03 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:04:52PM +0200, CaStarCo wrote: I've created a second (very little too) patch to reduce the scope of a variable. --- a/sal/osl/w32/file_dirvol.cxx +++ b/sal/osl/w32/file_dirvol.cxx @@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ extern "C" BOOL Ti

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 37390, which changed state. Bug 37390 Summary: LibreOffice does not create valid ODF. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37390 What|Old Value |New Value

Re: [Libreoffice] Cppcheck defect when @ is present

On 09/11/2011 01:27 PM, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote: What's the best thing to do : - to keep objective C++ parts ? - to replace objective C++ by plain (with or without boost) C++ ? for me there are already too many languages and flavour of languages. I would stay with plain C++, not adding objec

[Libreoffice] Experimental features

Hi all, I can't find a list of all experimental features that are enabled by the option in Tools > Options > LibreOffice > General Does such a list exist ? Experimental features I know : - macros recorder - in-line formula editor Is there something else ? In http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/