On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 10:31 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> On 2012-04-19 10:27, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > Huge code changes like this will make the re-licensing / re-basing
> > process much more problematic for very little win in the compiled code.
>
> Sure the difficulty of the re-basing process i
On 2012-04-19 10:27, Michael Meeks wrote:
Huge code changes like this will make the re-licensing / re-basing
process much more problematic for very little win in the compiled code.
Sure the difficulty of the re-basing process is only concerned with the
difference between state of the initial
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 09:52 +0200, Dézsi Szabolcs wrote:
> Hi, I'm going to send these on a per module basis for easier
> reviewing. (Previous 1.5M sized megapatch was very difficult to
> review)
Huge code changes like this will make the re-licensing / re-basing
process much more problema