Hi all,
what i discuss with Tor
i mean the construct
(void) bSuccess;
assert(bSuccess);
is a little bit ugly
In assert.h
#ifdef NDEBUG
#define assert(_Expression) ((void)0)
#else
Why '((void)0)' better empty or
we define this
#ifdef NDEBUG
#define
On 11/07/2014 11:02 AM, Juergen Funk Mailinglist wrote:
i mean the construct
(void) bSuccess;
assert(bSuccess);
is a little bit ugly
That's a well-known shortcoming of standard C assert, inherited by C++.
See
I removed hopefully most of those that were truly unused (on any platform):
commit 8f266781a6bd6a629bce65c0f613683047c9a794 (*HEAD*, *origin/master*,
*origin/HEAD*, *master*)
Author: Tor Lillqvist t...@collabora.com
Date: Thu Nov 6 12:56:18 2014 +0200
Bin unused include files, thanks to
Hi Andrea,
Il 05/11/2014 11:37, Andrea Gelmini ha scritto:
Hi everybody,
and thanks a lot for you work.
With an ignorant approach (bash, grep, make friends) I have found
Is it the same approach as
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42949#c0 ?
As you may see later in the
