[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2025-01-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED S

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2025-01-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #15 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) from comment #14) > maybe some line breaks could be introduced into the tooltip. Depends on the VCL whether it auto breaks or not. Kf6 does it right. Thought we

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2025-01-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #14 from Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) --- Created attachment 198509 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=198509&action=edit The dialog in current nightly Checked in current nightly, looks okay: Version:

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2025-01-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #13 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11) There is never such "balance". Tooltip is never a substitution for good help; if the information is *not* in help, it must be added there. People may disa

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2025-01-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #12 from Commit Notification --- Gabor Kelemen committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/help/commit/542ec4ede3c0d1ce2ffc99e41762d85b5a5d14a2 tdf#161411 Add detaile

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2025-01-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #10) > If users do not understand ... "Unicode 'Basic Latin'" It's always a balance act between tooltips explaining a function and the help going into the detai

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2025-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #10 from Mike Kaganski --- There is Help system suitable for the verbose listing. I do not see why would we want to fit everything into the UI - was Help deprecated for some reason? If users do not understand what is included

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2025-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||target:25.8.0 -- You are

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2025-01-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #9 from Commit Notification --- Balazs Varga committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/89c00618b9cee6e786fd11a7fdbf7aaf24e4fbb7 tdf#161411 - UI: Add Bet

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2024-06-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|needsUXEva

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2024-06-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #7 from Tuomas Hietala --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5) > If we end up in a verbose label, I suggest to keep a short label and have > the explanatory text in a tooltip. > > ("aka" might become a migraine for l10

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2024-06-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #6 from Tuomas Hietala --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #4) > Unlike the Unicode 'Basic Latin' block, referring to ASCII is a problem as > non-standard Extended-ASCII and localized 8-bit character mappings remain >

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2024-06-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze --- If we end up in a verbose label, I suggest to keep a short label and have the explanatory text in a tooltip. ("aka" might become a migraine for l10n) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2024-06-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vsfo...@libreoffice.org --- Com

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2024-06-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 --- Comment #3 from Tuomas Hietala --- Yes, "Basic Latin" is correct in the sense that it's the official name of the Unicode block. But if you don't know it's a name of a Unicode block (and I think most users don't), there's a lot of room

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2024-06-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tuomas.hiet...@iki.fi --- Comment

[Bug 161411] UI Better wording for ASCII-only characters

2024-06-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161411 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advis