On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:25:10PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 03:02 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:16:35PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >>On 10/12/2011 04:39 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
> >>>Escape strings so they're safe to pass to the shell. Based on glib's
> >>>g
On 10/13/2011 03:02 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:16:35PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 10/12/2011 04:39 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
Escape strings so they're safe to pass to the shell. Based on glib's
g_quote_string.
Is this still true, or does it now resemble more what I di
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:16:35PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/12/2011 04:39 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
> >Escape strings so they're safe to pass to the shell. Based on glib's
> >g_quote_string.
>
> Is this still true, or does it now resemble more what I did
> (independently from g_quote_string
Hello,
I have a De-Ja-Vu:
On Thursday 13 October 2011 01:16:35 Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/12/2011 04:39 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
> > Escape strings so they're safe to pass to the shell. Based on glib's
> > g_quote_string.
We already have a escape-for-shell function: please have a look at
src/qem
On 10/12/2011 04:39 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
Escape strings so they're safe to pass to the shell. Based on glib's
g_quote_string.
Is this still true, or does it now resemble more what I did
(independently from g_quote_string) in tools/virsh.c cmdEcho?
---
src/libvirt_private.syms |1 +
Escape strings so they're safe to pass to the shell. Based on glib's
g_quote_string.
---
src/libvirt_private.syms |1 +
src/util/buf.c | 54 ++
src/util/buf.h |1 +
3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --g
