On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:22:53AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/16/2014 05:16 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
This way it behaves more like the daemon itself does (acquiring a
pidfile, deleting the socket before binding, etc.).
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927369
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:59:21AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/17/2014 10:00 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:22:53AM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/16/2014 05:16 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
This way it behaves more like the daemon itself does (acquiring a
This way it behaves more like the daemon itself does (acquiring a
pidfile, deleting the socket before binding, etc.).
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927369
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138604
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander mklet...@redhat.com
On 09/16/2014 05:16 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
This way it behaves more like the daemon itself does (acquiring a
pidfile, deleting the socket before binding, etc.).
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927369
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138604