On 10/17/2011 01:58 PM, David Stevens wrote:
Stefan Berger wrote on 10/17/2011 10:31:29
AM:
was not.
Yes, then I understood this correctly. See the other mails regarding the
problems I am seeing with it. If there was a way to figure out at what
position to insert a rule into an existing chai
Stefan Berger wrote on 10/17/2011 10:31:29
AM:
> > was not.
> Yes, then I understood this correctly. See the other mails regarding the
> problems I am seeing with it. If there was a way to figure out at what
> position to insert a rule into an existing chain, i.e. at position 5,
> rather th
On 10/17/2011 01:23 PM, David Stevens wrote:
Stefan Berger wrote on 10/17/2011 09:07:12
AM:
On 10/12/2011 03:50 PM, David L Stevens wrote:
This patch adds the internal capability to add rules to existing
chains instead of using temporary chains and to generate placeholders
for
chains th
Stefan Berger wrote on 10/17/2011 09:07:12
AM:
> On 10/12/2011 03:50 PM, David L Stevens wrote:
> >This patch adds the internal capability to add rules to existing
> > chains instead of using temporary chains and to generate placeholders
for
> > chains that are referenced without generating
On 10/12/2011 03:50 PM, David L Stevens wrote:
This patch adds the internal capability to add rules to existing
chains instead of using temporary chains and to generate placeholders for
chains that are referenced without generating a rule for them immediately.
Finally, it includes variabl
This patch adds the internal capability to add rules to existing
chains instead of using temporary chains and to generate placeholders for
chains that are referenced without generating a rule for them immediately.
Finally, it includes variable matching for filter instantiation
(i.e., instan
