On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Mitchel Sonies wrote:
> This is addressed in the comment to the license. It is a new provision,
> but I think it plugs a loophole in the whole licensing schema, and I
> wonder why it's never been addressed before. I think small open vendor
> A is probably saying that Monopoly
> On 7/16/2003, "Mark Rafn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I don't think that most agree that the requirement to give source and
> >distribution rights to all users is an acceptible solution.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Ryo Chijiiwa wrote:
> Perhaps my interpretation of the GPL is incorrect, but I thought
2 matches
Mail list logo