On 8/26/15, 3:14 AM, License-discuss on behalf of David Woolley
license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org on behalf of
for...@david-woolley.me.uk wrote:
On 26/08/15 01:45, Tzeng, Nigel H. wrote:
Larry,
Scenario A: I¹m looking for an example in my codebase on how to do Foo
(of course) and I
On 26/08/15 01:45, Tzeng, Nigel H. wrote:
Larry,
Scenario A: I’m looking for an example in my codebase on how to do Foo
(of course) and I find a code snippet to do roughly what I want. I cut
and paste it into where I need it, modify it slightly and move on.
Developers do this all the time.
, August 20, 2015 8:25 AM
To: 'Richard Eckart de Castilho' richard.eck...@gmail.com;
license-discuss@opensource.org
Cc: Lawrence Rosen lro...@rosenlaw.com
Subject: RE: [License-discuss] Category B licenses at Apache
snip
___
License-discuss mailing list
License
; license-discuss@opensource.org
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Category B licenses at Apache
Larry,
Please note that ECL is an OSI approved license based on Apache and not
Eclipse. Using ECL in the same sentence as MPL is mildly confusing even
when you (re)define the acronym in the previous
.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Eckart de Castilho [mailto:richard.eck...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 12:14 AM
To: Lawrence Rosen lro...@rosenlaw.com; license-discuss@opensource.org
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Category B licenses at Apache
Hi Larry,
On 17.08.2015, at 21
...@jhuapl.edumailto:nigel.tz...@jhuapl.edu,
License Discuss
license-discuss@opensource.orgmailto:license-discuss@opensource.org
Cc: Lawrence Rosen lro...@rosenlaw.commailto:lro...@rosenlaw.com
Subject: RE: [License-discuss] Category B licenses at Apache
Responding to Nigel Tzeng's concerns (below) about source
Hi Larry,
On 17.08.2015, at 21:20, Lawrence Rosen lro...@rosenlaw.com wrote:
snip
But then that Policy makes the following strange explanation for Category B
and its enforcement conditions at ASF: By including only the object/binary
form, there is less exposed surface area of the
Subject: [License-discuss] Category B licenses at Apache
An Apache member wrote that this ASF license objective is firmly held: To allow
our customers to redistribute with closed-source modifications.
That objective remains completely and always enforceable for ALv2 code. It is
not enforceable
An Apache member wrote that this ASF license objective is firmly held: To
allow our customers to redistribute with closed-source modifications.
That objective remains completely and always enforceable for ALv2 code. It
is not enforceable for Eclipse (ECL) components or MPLv2 components.
These
An Apache member wrote that this ASF license objective is firmly held: To allow
our customers to redistribute with closed-source modifications.
That objective remains completely and always enforceable for ALv2 code. It is
not enforceable for Eclipse (ECL) components or MPLv2 components.
10 matches
Mail list logo
