Joe Neeman schrieb:
On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 22:14 +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
Issue 1080: Regression: bar lines in double bar are positioned too
close together
"pnorcks" mentions commit 27a4d9354effb09c696925881ec4df007da8a0db
as a possible cause. Reverting part of that commit:
gives me the atta
hi all,
updated the patch fixing the issue and attached
an example where the previous version failed.
> the cause of the problem was note_dur being
> less than left_to_do_, as noted in the comment I added.
>
> the fix itself is the following part:
> - if (nb.main_part_ && nb < note_dur.get_lengt
Hello,
Just to prevent that my tiny advances on #1036 get lost, here are my
random notes on the issue. Those notes are very messed but after a
rest my head will surely understand certain things a bit more clearly.
http://wiki.lilynet.net/index.php/Issue1036
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
w
hi all,
attached a patch fixing the issue.
the cause of the problem was note_dur being
less than left_to_do_, as noted in the comment I added.
the fix itself is the following part:
- if (nb.main_part_ && nb < note_dur.get_length ())
+ if (nb.main_part_ && nb < left_to_do_)
the remaining bit s
On 5/13/10 2:31 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen:
>> On 5/13/10 2:08 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
> ...
>>> In http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1080 there is a
>>> grace-start-good.png .
> ...
>> IIUC, Neil's patch was already demonstrated to meet issue 1. But issue 2
>
Carl Sorensen:
> On 5/13/10 2:08 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
...
> > In http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1080 there is a
> > grace-start-good.png .
...
> IIUC, Neil's patch was already demonstrated to meet issue 1. But issue 2
> was not yet checked.
Are you mixing this up with
On 5/13/10 2:08 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen:
>> On 5/13/10 1:11 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
> ...
>>> But if I already have a known good result from the code tracker,
>>> how do I compare it with the new result?
>>
>> What do you mean by "if I already have a known good result from the
Carl Sorensen:
> On 5/13/10 1:11 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
...
> > But if I already have a known good result from the code tracker,
> > how do I compare it with the new result?
>
> What do you mean by "if I already have a known good result from the code
> tracker"?
In http://code.google.com/p/lil
On 5/13/10 1:11 PM, "Karl Hammar" wrote:
> Graham:
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:06:45AM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
>>> How do one do a regtest?
>>
>> Regression check; by compiling stuff.
>>
>>> 8.1 Introduction to regression tests
>>>
>>> The regression tests are automatically compiled
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 09:11:18PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
> Graham:
> > They might be "make baseline-test", followed by applying a patch,
> > followed by "make check", but I'm not certain. It's explained
> > somewhere in Contributing 2.
>
> Ok, found something in "3.6.3 Testing LilyPond" (thou
Graham:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:06:45AM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
> > How do one do a regtest?
>
> Regression check; by compiling stuff.
>
> > 8.1 Introduction to regression tests
> >
> > The regression tests are automatically compiled using special `make'
> > targets. The output of
On 05/12/2010 12:32 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
[the previous announcement stated ".12" instead of ".21"]
We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.13.21. This
release contains the usual number of bugfixes. However, a number
of critical issues still remain, so this release is intended f
2010/5/13 Reinhold Kainhofer :
>
> [...]
>
> And then I got the final page, and there it was:
>
> "Music engraving by LilyPond 2.12.3 -- www.lilypond.org
> Engraver Gianluca D'Orazio -- his.em...@example.com"
>
> WOW! You can't image what it feels like to be surprised like this in
> such a
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 09:41:47AM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
> Issue 815: Enhancement: AJAX-powered search auto-completion for the online
> documentation
>
> Issue 1038: more technical website items
>
> Theese two seem to be related to the web site, not to the released
> software. I can unders
Am 12.05.2010, 23:36 Uhr, schrieb Maximilian Albert
:
Same here. :) Although in a rehearsal one would usually just say
something like "in Takt ..." instead of using a construction involving
"Taktzahlen".
Yes, right.
"Conductor: Again from bar five please.
Voice from back of viola section: Bu
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:14:17PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
> ***
> Issue 815: Enhancement: AJAX-powered search auto-completion for the online
> documentation
> Why is this a critical issue for the lilypond release?
Because the patch has been hanging around for over a year. My
decision on this
2010/5/13 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> "Music engraving by LilyPond 2.12.3 -- www.lilypond.org
> Engraver Gianluca D'Orazio -- his.em...@example.com"
Gianluca has been active on the user's list since 2006 to 2008 approx.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
__
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:44:30PM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nice to have a link to the bug tracker from
>
> http://lilypond.org/devel/
That website is (almost) deprecated; the new website is:
http://lilypond.org/website/bug-reports.html
Cheers,
- Graham
__
Issue 815: Enhancement: AJAX-powered search auto-completion for the online
documentation
Issue 1038: more technical website items
Theese two seem to be related to the web site, not to the released
software. I can understand that it can be critical for the official
site, but how can that be cri
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:57:05PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 12 May 2010 15:59, Graham Percival wrote:
> > Any chance that somebody could step in, make the required changes, and
> > get it pushed?
>
> Is it holding up 2.14? ;)
Not by itself; I was sending a reminder because the patch has b
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:06:45AM +0200, Karl Hammar wrote:
> How do one do a regtest?
Regression check; by compiling stuff.
> 8.1 Introduction to regression tests
>
> The regression tests are automatically compiled using special `make'
> targets. The output of the regression tests is al
Issue 881: Arpeggios may collide with laissezVibrer ties
According to the bug tracker, v2.11.19's output is what to aim for.
Neil gave the fix:
(define-public (laissez-vibrer::print grob)
(ly:tie::print grob))
(then add laissez-vibrer::print to pure-print-callbacks)
But he has not done a re
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Henning Plumeyer wrote:
> >I'm not an active musician, and only decades ago I did do music
> >with others (orchestra, choir), so I may be wrong, but I've a strong
> >feeling towards `Taktnummern'. It's less ambigous.
>
> I've been in hundreds of rehearsals
Am Donnerstag, 13. Mai 2010, um 06:38:42 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> Was the music font lily's feta font? The G-clef is a give-away,
> because Feta's is quite unlike any other G-clef.
Yes, it was the feta font. I just didn't think of the G-clef, but at some
other peculiarities that I have exper
24 matches
Mail list logo
