% Feel free to compile the whole message...
%
% Is there a way to target a specific context (eg. one of
% several Staff contexts) from within the \layout block?
% Here's one case (of many) where I think this would be
% useful:
\version "2.13.34"
%% music for the individual parts:
violin = { c''1
Graham Percival wrote:
> Could you stick the next version of this patch on Reitveld? I
> think there's enough interest, and enough opinions on it, that
> this would be worthwhile.
I've not changed anything since last post, but here it is:
http://codereview.appspot.com/2226045/
- Mark
__
Am Montag, 20. September 2010, um 20:25:30 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
> > My only problem now is that when I add definitions like (so that one can
> > also force other types than the pre-defined ones):
> >
> I am not sure. The warning comes fro
Reviewers: carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com,
Message:
On 2010/09/19 08:29:23, Carl wrote:
As currently implemented, this patch fails when \partial is called in
the middle
of a measure. I'm not sure \partial *should* work when called in the
middle of
a measure, but we have plenty of history on -use
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>>> -...@subheading Other programs can export LilyPond code
>>> +...@subheading Other programs that can export LilyPond code
>>
>> This makes it sound as though the previous programs can
>> export lilypond code. Only De
Graham Percival wrote:
>> -...@subheading Other programs can export LilyPond code
>> +...@subheading Other programs that can export LilyPond code
>
> This makes it sound as though the previous programs can
> export lilypond code. Only Denemo falls into that
> category; all the other programs are t
On 20 September 2010 19:07, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Okay, I have now changed the code to use a new PartCombineForceEvent (had to
> add a dummy translator listener to the part-combine engraver to silence
> lilypond)
Adding the event to `unlistened-music-event-classes' will silence it
without
On 20 Sep 2010, at 18:00, Wols Lists wrote:
As a related issue, have you considered how (different kinds of)
transposition would be handled in your pitch scheme?
This is much simpler: the linear combinations are vectors that you
just add. For example, if a, b, c, ... are represented by 0, M,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Am Freitag, 17. September 2010, 14:52:50 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
>>
>> wrote:
>> > So, you think we should rather extend the parser to cater for that
>> > feature? (Or do you know
Am Freitag, 17. September 2010, 14:52:50 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
>
> wrote:
> > So, you think we should rather extend the parser to cater for that
> > feature? (Or do you know any way to insert an event in simple_music
> > without extending
On 20/09/10 14:41, Hans Aberg wrote:
>> As a related issue, have you considered how (different kinds of)
>> transposition would be handled in your pitch scheme?
>
>
> This is much simpler: the linear combinations are vectors that you
> just add. For example, if a, b, c, ... are represented by 0, M
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:25 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Joseph Wakeling writes:
>
>> Indeed, d-3/4 is not sufficient [1]: in arrow quarter-tone notation you
>> want to be able to indicate quarter-tone raising or lowering of any of
>> the 12 standard tones.
>
> One solution would be to allow pitch
Hi,
thanks for answer, so the e-mail adress, I sent the files is good for
translation issues and I will send the answers there, not directly to
developers. :-)
I think, that I am the only one in this moment, who cares about bringing
LilyPond to Czech language. I´ve already worked on lilypond.po
On 20 Sep 2010, at 18:08, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
One scan should be fine. The first step is to convince people that
the representation needs to be extended, and Stone should be
sufficient for that. The next step is for somebody actually code it.
Sure. I'll try and follow up with Hans separa
Joseph Wakeling writes:
> On 09/20/2010 03:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
>> Hmm. This is similar to the distinction between cis and des, correct?
>
> Yes, exactly, it's an enharmonic equivalence.
>
>> Am I also correct in assuming that d-3/4 is not sufficient? Also, is
>> there a frequency dif
On 09/20/2010 05:27 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
>> For arrowed quarter-tones the notation is described (and recommended) in
>> Kurt Stone's book "Music Notation in the Twentieth Century".
>
> Excellent reference! That book is frequently quoted on this list, so
> this should settle any question of
Hi Pavel,
Francisco has already replied to you while I was writing this, so the
reply about the node name issue w.r.t. cases in Czech is just a
rewording of his last reply.
Il giorno dom, 19/09/2010 alle 15.36 +0200, Pavel Fric ha scritto:
> I send the files in attachment. The .po file was sent a
2010/9/20 Francisco Vila :
>> @ref{Textový vstup}
>> @unnumberedsec Textový vstup
>> @translationof Text input
>>
>> and on other place:
>>
>> @ref{Textovém vstupu}
>> Does it matter? This "problem" - difference between text strings in braces
>> is only on some places, not all. The solution would
2010/9/19 Pavel Fric :
> Hi,
>
> Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain): "From now on, please keep this conversation
> in the translators list."
>
> Could you provide link to this mailing list?
http://lists.lilynet.net/translations/
> I have one question. There are lines with:
>
>
> @ref{Textový vstup}
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Joseph Wakeling
wrote:
> On 09/20/2010 03:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
>> 2) make a scan of some published music that uses this notation. This
>> will immediately silence anybody who wants to argue (as I somewhat
>> did) that a single fraction is sufficient to sh
Keith E OHara wrote Monday, September 20, 2010 12:38 AM
I am suggesting a new @knownissues for the Notation Reference
2.2.1. The corresponding bug tracker issues are 1043, 439, and
36. If issue 1043 is solved, the second paragraph of my
suggestion will become obsolete.
I wrote the text
On 09/20/2010 03:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> Hmm. This is similar to the distinction between cis and des, correct?
Yes, exactly, it's an enharmonic equivalence.
> Am I also correct in assuming that d-3/4 is not sufficient? Also, is
> there a frequency difference between c+1/4 and cis-1/4 ?
Hi,
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain): "From now on, please keep this conversation in
the translators list."
Could you provide link to this mailing list?
I send the files in attachment. The .po file was sent already before. The
template was taken from German translation files, so I didn't handle
Friends of LilyPond,
I am suggesting a new @knownissues for the Notation Reference 2.2.1. The
corresponding bug tracker issues are 1043, 439, and 36. If issue 1043 is
solved, the second paragraph of my suggestion would be come obsolete.
I wrote the text below based on observed behavior of
Friends of LilyPond,
I am suggesting a new @knownissues for the Notation Reference 2.2.1. The
corresponding bug tracker issues are 1043, 439, and 36. If issue 1043 is
solved, the second paragraph of my suggestion will become obsolete.
I wrote the text below based on observed behavior of Lil
On 20 Sep 2010, at 14:48, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
I saw the post but was not sure quite how to interpret it.
I expected someone to ask for details. In the past, I discussed
part of
it with Graham Breed, who did some LilyPond microtonal
implementation,
but perhaps he is not working on it an
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Joseph Wakeling
wrote:
>
> *A key assumption of this approach is that there is a one-to-one
> correspondence between accidental and alteration value.* This clearly
> holds for conventional Western 12-tone notation. However, it does _not_
> hold for many _microto
On 09/20/2010 12:23 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
>> I saw the post but was not sure quite how to interpret it.
>
> I expected someone to ask for details. In the past, I discussed part of
> it with Graham Breed, who did some LilyPond microtonal implementation,
> but perhaps he is not working on it anymore
On 20 Sep 2010, at 12:08, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Hence why I say that the issue of effective microtonal support still
requires action at the code level, and is not simply a matter of
better
documentation ... :-(
I made a post about this issue last week, but there were no
responses.
http
On 09/20/2010 10:47 AM, Hans Aberg wrote:
> On 20 Sep 2010, at 00:50, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
>
>> Hence why I say that the issue of effective microtonal support still
>> requires action at the code level, and is not simply a matter of better
>> documentation ... :-(
>
> I made a post about this i
On Wed 15 Sep 2010, 22:40 Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> On 15 September 2010 19:53, Vicente Solsona wrote:
> > It probably has something to do with the fact that string numbers and
> > right hand fingers must be put inside a chord, but skips cannot, but
> > I'm stuck here.
>
> This limitation that stri
On 20 Sep 2010, at 00:50, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
Hence why I say that the issue of effective microtonal support still
requires action at the code level, and is not simply a matter of
better
documentation ... :-(
I made a post about this issue last week, but there were no responses.
http://
Hello all,
This email is an attempt to clarify some outstanding issues regarding
support for microtonal notation in Lilypond. It's being written in
response to recent discussion with Graham Percival on Lilypond Issue
694: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=694
To begin with, let'
33 matches
Mail list logo