Problems with `\repeat percent'

[445bf3bb2fbd1f259fe43ade204fb34d68bdd581] Folks, have a look at NR section `Percent Repeats', `Known Issues and Warnings'. There is code like \relative c'' { \repeat percent 3 { \time 5/4 c2. 2 \time 4/4 2 2 } } which generates the attached image. The generation of a second staff

Re: Replace `-dgs-load-fonts' to `--bigpdfs' in lilypond-book (issue 300280043 by truer...@gmail.com)

On 7/22/16 12:35 PM, "James" wrote: > >jlowe@jloweDesktop ~/lilypond-git/build/input $ du -smh * | sort -hr >1.9Gregression >8.0Kout-www >8.0Kout >4.0KGNUmakefile Do we turn off point and click when doing the doc builds? Carl

Re: Replace `-dgs-load-fonts' to `--bigpdfs' in lilypond-book (issue 300280043 by truer...@gmail.com)

James writes: > NB> It seems that the Japanese docs are built using its own 'build' > dir (i.e. it has its own out-www build doc and doesn't seem to share > any of the files the other docs do while building, but I am probably > not understanding this). > > Are we wasting build time

Re: Replace `-dgs-load-fonts' to `--bigpdfs' in lilypond-book (issue 300280043 by truer...@gmail.com)

hello, On 22/07/16 18:48, Carl Sorensen wrote: On 7/22/16 9:35 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup" wrote: A 30% reduction in the final output file size sounds nice. Personally, I find the prospect of

Re: Replace `-dgs-load-fonts' to `--bigpdfs' in lilypond-book (issue 300280043 by truer...@gmail.com)

On 7/22/16 9:35 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of David Kastrup" wrote: > >A 30% reduction in the final output file size sounds nice. Personally, >I find the prospect of not having 4GB of disk usage for running

Re: ps2pdf issues

>> For remote PDF links, rather than they are lost, I think that PDF >> destination names are replaced. > > Hmm. This smells fishy. > >> Would you know a tool other than texinfo that can generate remote >> PDF links? > > Sorry, no. I've noticed that plain pdfTeX (without texinfo) can generate

Re: Replace `-dgs-load-fonts' to `--bigpdfs' in lilypond-book (issue 300280043 by truer...@gmail.com)

>> Comparing the `--bigpdfs' method with the fontless PDF approach as >> outlined above, the latter creates a final output file about 30% >> smaller (at least in my small test). > > A 30% reduction in the final output file size sounds nice. This is an *additional* 30%, since `--bigpdfs' already

Re: Replace `-dgs-load-fonts' to `--bigpdfs' in lilypond-book (issue 300280043 by truer...@gmail.com)

Werner LEMBERG writes: > About a month ago we discussed how to reduce the disk space necessary > for builing the lilypond documentation. > >> [...] Since lilypond itself converts all fonts to PostScript >> resources, why not writing those resources to a `fontresource' >> directory

Re: Replace `-dgs-load-fonts' to `--bigpdfs' in lilypond-book (issue 300280043 by truer...@gmail.com)

> ps2pdf -I \ > -dNOSAFER -P \ > Fontless.pdf WithEmbeddedFonts.pdf This should rather be ps2pdf -I \ -dNOSAFER \ Fontless.pdf WithEmbeddedFonts.pdf I've tested with the fonts in the current directory, thus `-P'. Werner

Re: Replace `-dgs-load-fonts' to `--bigpdfs' in lilypond-book (issue 300280043 by truer...@gmail.com)

About a month ago we discussed how to reduce the disk space necessary for builing the lilypond documentation. > [...] Since lilypond itself converts all fonts to PostScript > resources, why not writing those resources to a `fontresource' > directory instead of embedding? We could add a

Patches for issue #4814

Hello, I made 2 patches for issue #4814 and for a FTBFS witch gcc 6 on Fedora 24. These 2 patches seem to solve that problem for me. Best regards Guido Aulisi From 682f75315e6820220ecf45717664f6d32f480c98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guido Aulisi Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016

Re: Optional fraction after \afterGrace command (issue 304200043 by d...@gnu.org)

On 2016/07/22 07:55:54, dak wrote: On 2016/07/22 07:41:00, http://mark_opus11.net wrote: > On 2016/07/22 04:26:01, lemzwerg wrote: > > LGMT. Thanks a lot! > > Might it be a good idea to keep one example using the old define method, which > is still more convenient for setting the value for

Re: Optional fraction after \afterGrace command (issue 304200043 by d...@gnu.org)

Reviewers: lemzwerg, mark_opus11.net, Message: On 2016/07/22 07:41:00, mark_opus11.net wrote: On 2016/07/22 04:26:01, lemzwerg wrote: > LGMT. Thanks a lot! Might it be a good idea to keep one example using the old define method, which is still more convenient for setting the value for

Re: Optional fraction after \afterGrace command (issue 304200043 by d...@gnu.org)

On 2016/07/22 04:26:01, lemzwerg wrote: LGMT. Thanks a lot! Might it be a good idea to keep one example using the old define method, which is still more convenient for setting the value for multiple usages of \afterGrace (or globally)? https://codereview.appspot.com/304200043/

Re: 4919: beam 1/20 and shorter notes by 1/4 in 2/2 and 3/2 time (issue 303980043 by simon.albre...@mail.de)

https://codereview.appspot.com/303980043/diff/20001/scm/time-signature-settings.scm File scm/time-signature-settings.scm (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/303980043/diff/20001/scm/time-signature-settings.scm#newcode73 scm/time-signature-settings.scm:73: ((beamExceptions . ((end . ((1/20 .