Carl Sorensen schrieb:
On 6/30/10 1:48 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
[...]
http://codereview.appspot.com/1669041/diff/26001/27004#newcode130
scm/define-grob-properties.scm:130: (bracket-width ,number? Width of
the harmonic angle bracket.)
Why do
n.putt...@gmail.com schrieb:
On 2010/06/30 07:48:12, marc wrote:
So I tried to extend the parenthesize-stencil function in
scm/stencil.scm.
It compiles without error, but the regression file is cluttered up.
I can't test this. Would you mind uploading another version here which
includes
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
[...]
http://codereview.appspot.com/1669041/diff/26001/27004#newcode130
scm/define-grob-properties.scm:130: (bracket-width ,number? Width of
the harmonic angle bracket.)
Why do we need bracket-width? Why can't we just use the pre-existing
width property?
Hm, Neil
On 6/30/10 1:48 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
Carl Sorensen schrieb:
[...]
http://codereview.appspot.com/1669041/diff/26001/27004#newcode130
scm/define-grob-properties.scm:130: (bracket-width ,number? Width of
the harmonic angle bracket.)
Why do we need bracket-width? Why can't
carl.d.soren...@gmail.com schrieb:
Looks pretty good. I have a few comments about things that seem to be
unnecessarily specific to harmonics.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/1669041/diff/26001/27003
File scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm (right):
On 6/27/10 3:19 AM, Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote:
carl.d.soren...@gmail.com schrieb:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1669041/diff/26001/27003
File scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1669041/diff/26001/27003#newcode91
scm/define-grob-interfaces.scm:91:
n.putt...@gmail.com schrieb:
On 2010/06/21 19:06:52, marc wrote:
Now I *must* overlook the obvious, because the fret numbers still
disappear,
even if they are not tied together.
Remember what I said about 'layer?
Yes, of course, but since the HarmonicParenthesesItem *did* work before
