On 31 juil. 2012, at 14:03, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>>
>> Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 7:11 PM
>>
>>> \version "2.16.0"
>>> \score {
> ...
>>> \midi {}
>>> }
>>
>> Currently this code produces no pdf and, if \layou
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26:12AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 7:11 PM
>
> > \version "2.16.0"
> > \score {
...
> > \midi {}
> > }
>
> Currently this code produces no pdf and, if \layout {} is
> added, no titles.
>
> Was this an intentional sug
Graham Percival wrote Monday, July 30, 2012 7:11 PM
> ** Subset for first phase
>
> In greater detail: I’m suggesting that we have multiple rounds of
> syntax stabilization. The proposed elements of current lilypond
> notation which we will stabilize is captured by these two files:
>
> \version
There seems to be fairly broad support for _some_ form of
standardization. Here's an update of the proposal along those
lines, along with brief responses to common concerns, in order to
let people just joining the discussion to skip the past 50 emails.
Better formatting here:
http://lilypond.org/