Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2015-01-05 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
>> How does the upgrade to gcc 4.8.2 look now ? > > Just wondering: There is already a gcc 4.9.x series, so why are we > trying to update to 4.8.x? In this branch, I've tried gcc-4.9. https://github.com/trueroad/gub/tree/gcc-4.9 I've succeed to build lilypond-installer for mingw, linux-x86, lin

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2015-01-04 Thread Masamichi HOSODA
> The changes from Masamichi to librestrict look safe, > and the later floating-point-endless-loop-eating-all-memory should be > gone now that I've re-worked the skyline merge code. > > If gcc 4.8.2 still looks difficult, I'll look into problem with the > templates. Now, in this branch, https://g

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2015-01-03 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> How does the upgrade to gcc 4.8.2 look now ? Just wondering: There is already a gcc 4.9.x series, so why are we trying to update to 4.8.x? Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2015-01-03 Thread Keith OHara
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes: > >> Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes: > >>> /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org-- lilypond.git- > >>> release-unstable/lily/include/smobs.tcc:131: error: invalid operands of > >>> types 'scm_unused_struct* (Grob::*)()' and 'scm_unus

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-10-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Fails compiling for a different target now. Logfile attached again. /home/gub/gub/target/freebsd-64/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable/lily/include/smobs.tcc:136: error: invalid operands of types

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-10-14 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: "Phil Holmes" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:16 PM > Subject: Re: GUB fail with smob templates > > >> "Phil Holmes" writes:

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-10-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" This is getting absolutely ridiculous, but I pushed another "fix" to staging (basically, I now have to cast a member function pointer to its own type before comparing it with another member function pointer cast to its type)

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-10-14 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "David Kastrup" > To: "Phil Holmes" > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 6:41 PM > Subject: Re: GUB fail with smob templates > > >> Phil Holmes writes: >> >>

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-10-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes" To: "David Kastrup" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:03 AM Subject: Re: GUB fail with smob templates - Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Sunday, O

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-10-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 6:41 PM Subject: Re: GUB fail with smob templates Phil Holmes writes: GUB has again coughed on the changes to the SMOB code. It's well out of my depth to

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-10-12 Thread Phil Holmes
I'll try to see whether this is successful tomorrow afternoon. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 6:41 PM Subject: Re: GUB fail with smob templates Phil Holmes writes: GUB

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-10-12 Thread David Kastrup
Phil Holmes writes: > GUB has again coughed on the changes to the SMOB code. It's well out of > my depth to understand why, but I've pasted below some of the error > messages: the make is built with -j14, so I presume that's why there are > so many. > > /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lil

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-10-12 Thread David Kastrup
Phil Holmes writes: > GUB has again coughed on the changes to the SMOB code. It's well out of > my depth to understand why, but I've pasted below some of the error > messages: the make is built with -j14, so I presume that's why there are > so many. > > /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lil

GUB fail with smob templates

2014-10-12 Thread Phil Holmes
GUB has again coughed on the changes to the SMOB code. It's well out of my depth to understand why, but I've pasted below some of the error messages: the make is built with -j14, so I presume that's why there are so many. /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.gi

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-09-14 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 4:50 PM Subject: Re: GUB fail with smob templates David Kastrup writes: Phil Holmes writes: GUB failed today with the following errors: /home/gub/gub/t

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-09-14 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > Phil Holmes writes: > >> GUB failed today with the following errors: >> >> /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git- >> release-unstable/lily/include/unpure-pure-container.hh: In static member >> function 'static scm_unused_struct* Unpure

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

2014-09-14 Thread David Kastrup
Phil Holmes writes: > GUB failed today with the following errors: > > /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git- > release-unstable/lily/include/unpure-pure-container.hh: In static member > function 'static scm_unused_struct* Unpure_pure_container::make_smob > (sc

GUB fail with smob templates

2014-09-14 Thread Phil Holmes
GUB failed today with the following errors: /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git- release-unstable/lily/include/unpure-pure-container.hh: In static member function 'static scm_unused_struct* Unpure_pure_container::make_smob (scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_stru