Re: Should \relative be the default for musicxml2ly

2008-02-11 Thread Laura Conrad
> "Mats" == Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mats> Definitely relative! I don't feel strongly, but the other converters (midi2ly, abc2ly, etf2ly...) all use absolute pitches. And using relative definitely makes it necessary to be careful about taking an exerpt out of context, w

Re: Should \relative be the default for musicxml2ly

2008-02-11 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Definitely relative! /Mats Andrew Hawryluk wrote: I, too, am in favour of relative as the default. -AH On Feb 8, 2008 9:40 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, Musicxml2ly supports converting to both relative pitches and absolute pitches. The question I have is, whi

Re: Should \relative be the default for musicxml2ly

2008-02-08 Thread Andrew Hawryluk
I, too, am in favour of relative as the default. -AH On Feb 8, 2008 9:40 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > Musicxml2ly supports converting to both relative pitches and absolute pitches. > The question I have is, which one should be the default? The other would be > avai

Should \relative be the default for musicxml2ly

2008-02-08 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
Hi all, Musicxml2ly supports converting to both relative pitches and absolute pitches. The question I have is, which one should be the default? The other would be available via a command-line option (either -r / --relative or -a / --absolute) to musicxml2ly. I actually prefer relative pitches,