Re: convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-08 Thread dak
On 2012/10/08 20:08:20, Graham Percival wrote: The changelog says "Don't update \version when no rule is applied." That's what the existing -d --diff-version-update command does. No, that's what the existing -d --diff-version-update is supposed to do. The problem was that if the last applic

Re: convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-08 Thread Julien Rioux
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:08 PM, wrote: > The changelog says > > "Don't update \version when no rule is applied." > > That's what the existing -d --diff-version-update command does. If this > is intended to be the default behaviour now, then the command-line > option should be removed. No, -d do

Re: convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-08 Thread graham
The changelog says "Don't update \version when no rule is applied." That's what the existing -d --diff-version-update command does. If this is intended to be the default behaviour now, then the command-line option should be removed. I would rather keep convert-ly as-is (in terms of this behavio

Re: convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-07 Thread Janek WarchoĊ‚
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:05 AM, wrote: > I don't think we should be documenting the Python language, others do a > better job at that. Check out > http://docs.python.org/reference/lexical_analysis.html#strings> ah, ok. thanks! ___ lilypond-devel mail

Re: convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-07 Thread dak
On 2012/10/08 04:58:06, janek wrote: http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/diff/9001/scripts/convert-ly.py File scripts/convert-ly.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/diff/9001/scripts/convert-ly.py#newcode231 scripts/convert-ly.py:231: ly.progress (_ (u"Processing `%s\'... ") %

Re: convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-07 Thread janek . lilypond
http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/diff/9001/scripts/convert-ly.py File scripts/convert-ly.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/diff/9001/scripts/convert-ly.py#newcode231 scripts/convert-ly.py:231: ly.progress (_ (u"Processing `%s\'... ") % infile_name, True) is 'u' (here and in

Re: convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-06 Thread lemzwerg
LGTM now. http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-06 Thread Julien Rioux
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:06 AM, wrote: > Are you going to report the number of errors using the `errors' > variable? In case this is true, I would consider this a bad idea, since > you abuse the functionality of the exit status. > > How large can `errors' become? The value returned by `exit' mu

Re: convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-05 Thread lemzwerg
http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/diff/2001/scripts/convert-ly.py File scripts/convert-ly.py (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/diff/2001/scripts/convert-ly.py#newcode357 scripts/convert-ly.py:357: sys.exit(errors) Are you going to report the number of errors using the `errors' v

convert-ly (issue 2670) (issue 6610058)

2012-10-05 Thread julien . rioux
Reviewers: , Message: For review: Description: convert-ly: - Exit with error status when errors occur. - Use unicode strings for file names printing. - Don't update \version when no rule is applied. This fixes issue 2670. Please review this at http://codereview.appspot.com/6610058/ Affecte