On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2011/1/5 Francisco Vila :
>
>> The attached patch removes the box.
>
> Sorry! use this instead, the other removes a @divEnd and it shouldn't.
Thanks, pushed.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel
2011/1/5 Francisco Vila :
> The attached patch removes the box.
Sorry! use this instead, the other removes a @divEnd and it shouldn't.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
From 0ebb81d9a8f278cd1c9211936100b13419def84b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Francisco V
2011/1/5 James :
> Nils
>
> On 05/01/2011 15:22, Nils Gey wrote:
>>>
>>> Hopefully somebody will send a patch.
>>
>> Don't you have a Lilypond webmaster to remove the box?
>
> The website is generated in the same way we generate all of our
> 'documentation' (there are some differences but essential
Nils
On 05/01/2011 15:22, Nils Gey wrote:
Hopefully somebody will send a patch.
Don't you have a Lilypond webmaster to remove the box?
The website is generated in the same way we generate all of our
'documentation' (there are some differences but essentially it is the same).
That is anyon
> Hopefully somebody will send a patch.
Don't you have a Lilypond webmaster to remove the box? A dedicated webmaster
(maybe in personal union with other tasks) is a good thing because people like
to have one person as contact if they have problems with the webpage. I
strongly recommend to creat
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 03:49:03PM +0100, Nils Gey wrote:
> I noticed that on http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html Denemo is described
> as using an outdated version Lilypond.
>
> I would like to ask where you got that information and why do you think it is
> (still) valid.
We have asked for
Greetings List,
I noticed that on http://lilypond.org/easier-editing.html Denemo is described
as using an outdated version Lilypond.
I would like to ask where you got that information and why do you think it is
(still) valid.
Denemo works with 2.12 and 2.13 just well and emits that version info