On 20.09.2007 (00:55), Graham Percival wrote:
> GENERAL DISCUSSION
> - I still like the division of musical notation / instrument-specific? No?
I have nothing against it, as long as vocal music isn't stuffed in
there. :-)
> - Assuming that the technical issues are solved, how do you want these
On 14.09.2007 (13:10), Graham Percival wrote:
> Eyolf Østrem wrote:
> >I don't like the sectioning of this one. Why is "Transpose" and
> >"Instrument transpositions" split up? It doesn't make sense to me.
> >Ottava brackets should also belong h
On 14.09.2007 (08:23), Graham Percival wrote:
> http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Doc
* 1 Notation Reference
o 1.1 Pitches
I don't like the sectioning of this one. Why is "Transpose" and
"Instrument transpositions" split up? It doesn't make sense to me.
Ottava brackets s
On 11.09.2007 (17:33), Graham Percival wrote:
> Trevor Bača wrote:
> >That then leaves the question of what to do with the other stuff. What
> >about this?
> > * Spacing: recast as a separate manual called Page Layout
> > * Input and output: move to Program Usage
> > * Changing defaults: move to
On 11.09.2007 (06:41), Trevor Bača wrote:
> Hey Graham, hey everyone,
>
> The GDP discussion has been extremely interesting and I think I've
> caught up on most of the threads. But I'm not certain so feel free to
> tell me if this topic has already come up.
>
> Question: has anyone suggested repl
> >BTW I'd like to see an forever-working URL like
> >http://lilypond.org/doc/current/Documentation/ (instead of the version;
> >should need only one symlink; maybe "current-stable" and "current-dev").
> Well,
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/
> gives you the current-dev. Yes, you
On 10.09.2007 (11:09), Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Graham (et al.):
> >Does anybody _like_ the current layout?
> That being said... ;-)
> >My preference is for 2
> Me 2.
Me 3.
--
paak, n:A stadium or inclosed playing field. To put or leave (a
a vehicle) for
On 10.09.2007 (09:06), Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
> >I doubt we have enough stuff to make a whole "Page layout" chapter.
> I disagree...
> There's *more* than enough for a Page Layout chapter: even if some (much?)
> of the material is referenced elsewhere/earlier, it would be benefi
On 10.09.2007 (05:28), Graham Percival wrote:
> Eyolf Østrem wrote:
> >I would also say -- although this may exceed the limits of what kind
> >of suggestions were allowed -- that one thing that is missing is a
> >comprehensive survey of the syntax of Lilypond.
> Lik
On 10.09.2007 (05:22), Graham Percival wrote:
> Rune Zedeler wrote:
> >And in all cases, it is way too early. The user has not even learned what
> >the "4" in "c4" means.
> Tutorial. If a user hasn't read the LM, they're on their own and I have
> *no* sympathy for them.
That's definitely the
On 09.09.2007 (16:32), Graham Percival wrote:
> Well, don't I feel like a complete newbie. :/Does anybody know how to
> make Thunderbird treat text like pure bloody text, and not change the
> displayed text when it sends an email out? thanks in advance. :(
One of the reasons why I prefer
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
