Piano pedal mark collision (\sustainOn, \sustainOff)

Hi! I have a problem with \sustainOn and \sustainOff colliding each other in some cases. I use following pattern s32*31\sustainOn s32\sustainOff instead of s1\sustainOff\sustainOn to achieve a bit better pedalling in MIDI, but it often looks bad on the paper. Is there any way to impro

Re: Piano pedal mark collision (\sustainOn, \sustainOff)

Hi! No one played with positions of \sustainOn and \sustainOff? On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Przemyslaw Pawelczyk wrote: > I have a problem with \sustainOn and \sustainOff colliding each other > in some cases. > I use following pattern > > s32*31\sustainOn s32\sustainOff [...] > but it o

RE: Piano pedal mark collision (\sustainOn, \sustainOff)

January 27, 2016 11:34 AM To: lilypond-user Subject: Re: Piano pedal mark collision (\sustainOn, \sustainOff) Hi! No one played with positions of \sustainOn and \sustainOff? On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Przemyslaw Pawelczyk wrote:, > I have a problem with \sustainOn and \sustainOff collidi

Re: Piano pedal mark collision (\sustainOn, \sustainOff)

Hi, > No one played with positions of \sustainOn and \sustainOff? Well, I took a couple of seconds, and failed. Then, just now, I realized there’s a possible solution: I don’t know if markup (or even “fake markup”) support

Re: Piano pedal mark collision (\sustainOn, \sustainOff)

Hi, Mark! On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > If acceptable, the use of "bracket" style can eliminate the conflict. Going in my pedal definition with: \set pedalSustainStyle = #'bracket is other kind of workaround, but text style is much more visually appealing to

Re: Piano pedal mark collision (\sustainOn, \sustainOff)

Hi, Kieren! On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: >> No one played with positions of \sustainOn and \sustainOff? > > Well, I took a couple of seconds, and failed. > > Then, just now, I realized there’s a possible solution: >

Re: Piano pedal mark collision (\sustainOn, \sustainOff)

Hi Przemyslaw, > Do you perhaps indirectly suggest something like replacing closing > asterisk "*" with asterisk with some space padding "* “? That’s exactly what I’m suggesting. > That could work too, I guess, if it's possible. Yes. And it would be the superior workaround, since it would invol