On 07.01.2008 (12:14), Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
>
>> I don't find the \overrides very hard to understand; it's one of the
>> very first thing I knew how to achieve in LilyPond (Bertalan's plugin
>> LilyPondTool helped me a lot to understand it, though).
>>
> Well, actually it was wha
I don't find the \overrides very hard to understand; it's one of the
very first thing I knew how to achieve in LilyPond (Bertalan's plugin
LilyPondTool helped me a lot to understand it, though).
Well, actually it was what made me start implementing the plugin: I also
wanted to understand \ov
The previous discussion got a bit off-topic, so to make this
easier to see I'm posting it again. I've updated the list of open
jobs and posted it online:
http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/lilyjobs.html
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lily
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:21:15 -0500
Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eyolf,
>
> On Jan 6, 2008, at 12:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > example, the problem is not so much knowing what it means -- that
> > can be
> > looked up quite easily
It *can be*. But *I'm* not going to bother. Why
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:51:13 -0500
Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> package. The index often lacks entries for my questions.
This is, fortunately, the easiest thing to fix.
In the docs, index entries are made in the relevant section. So
for example, in the "Ambitus" section, we might have som
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 17:15:34 +0100
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Plus, it includes the whole LilyPond Documentation as well, and
> searching for keywords is definitely much easier with this tool than
> with the very limited index -- AFAIK only Graham has ever used it ;)
No bloo
On 06.01.2008 (14:21), Reilly wrote:
> Eyolf,
>
> On Jan 6, 2008, at 12:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Perhaps I misunderstand the purpose of Graham's example question.
It's easy: the purpose of ALL of Graham's examples is that THIS TAKES
RESOURCES and no matter how good the idea is, someone
Eyolf,
On Jan 6, 2008, at 12:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
example, the problem is not so much knowing what it means -- that can
be
looked up quite easily -- but to know (a) what kind of variations does
a
user expect? does size matter? angle? are different symbols or styles
in
use, and are
Greetings all:
On Jan 6, 2008, at 11:15 AM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
Hopefully, the GDP will be able to remedy some of this. As one of the
rewriters of the Notation Reference (in fact the *only*, AKA "Mr
Zero"), I
can subscribe to some of the criticism. I don't know about the index
-- I
har
2008/1/6, Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If someone cares to do it, that is...
To be completely fair, it has already been done for a lot of very
common tweaks (e.g. \stemUp etc.)
I don't find the \overrides very hard to understand; it's one of the
very first thing I knew how to achieve in Li
On 06.01.2008 (17:15), Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2008/1/6, Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'd love to be able to write
> > \rehearsalmarks{alphabetic} or \setlenght{betweensystemspace}{2em} if
> > someone writes a package that includes it.
>
> What, you mean something like:
> http://lsr.d
2008/1/6, Eyolf Østrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hopefully, the GDP will be able to remedy some of this. As one of the
> rewriters of the Notation Reference (in fact the *only*, AKA "Mr Zero"), I
> can subscribe to some of the criticism. I don't know about the index -- I
> hardly ever use it, perhaps
On 06.01.2008 (09:51), Reilly wrote:
> No offense to everyone who has worked on the documentation for Lilypond, but
> the documentation is the weakest component of the package. The index often
> lacks entries for my questions. The entries more often than not, do not
> address my problems. The c
Graham and fellow Lilyponders:
I have been following the discussion of Graham's planned departure from
the Lilypond team and other recent discussions on the extent to
document code in style sheets and tweaks. I began using Lilypond in the
summer of 2007, after rejecting demo versions of the ma
2008/1/6, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "help ur program is broken. where are teh buttons 2 click on"
ahahahaha :)
(irrepressible hysterical laugh)
Still, if I might add a comment here, the quality we need the most is
*not* a high LilyPond skill-level, but simply patience, enthusiasm,
an
Thanks to everybody who expressed an interest helping lilypond!
I've discussed specifics with many of you, but I'm not certain
that I managed to contact everybody. If your email slipped
through the cracks, sorry, and please send it again!
If at all possible I prefer to let volunteers choose their
16 matches
Mail list logo
