RE: associatedVoice in 2.10.8

2007-01-06 Thread Georg Dummer
n-Wen Nienhuys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:30 PM >To: Georg Dummer >Cc: 'lilypond-user' >Subject: Re: associatedVoice in 2.10.8 > >Georg Dummer escreveu: >> Hi all, >> >> I changed the example for the associated voices

RE: associatedVoice in 2.10.8

2007-01-06 Thread Georg Dummer
Thanks for the fast reply, but now in 2.10.9 the syllables "sau" and "rus" are not applied to Voice lahlah. >-Original Message- >From: Georg Dummer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:52 AM >To: 'lilypond-user' >

Re: associatedVoice in 2.10.8

2007-01-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Georg Dummer escreveu: > Hi all, > > I changed the example for the associated voices a bit (first part of the > tuplet in the alternative voice is a rest instead of a note) to demonstrate > my problem. In version 2.8.8 the syllable "ran" is shifted to the next note > properly. Version 2.10.8 says

associatedVoice in 2.10.8

2007-01-05 Thread Georg Dummer
Hi all, I changed the example for the associated voices a bit (first part of the tuplet in the alternative voice is a rest instead of a note) to demonstrate my problem. In version 2.8.8 the syllable "ran" is shifted to the next note properly. Version 2.10.8 says: "Lyric syllable does not have no