On 17 July 2010 09:13, David Kastrup wrote:
> Wouldn't it make more sense if articulations were siphoned off a
> multimeasure and tacked back on by the multimeasure engraver?
They already are. The syntax constructor for full-bar rests converts
markup text and articulations into MultiMeasureText
> Message: 9
> Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:05:48 -0400
> From: "James Lowe"
> Subject: RE: fermata not shown at playing parts
> To: "David Kastrup" ,
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> play brass i
David Kastrup wrote Saturday, July 17, 2010 9:13 AM
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
OK, I've added a para to Articulations and ornaments in
Expressive
marks:
"Articulations can be attached to rests as well as notes but they
cannot be attached to multi-measure rests. A special predefined
command,
org
Subject: Re: fermata not shown at playing parts
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
Carl Sorensen wrote Saturday, July 17, 2010 6:10 AM
But in the Expressive Marks section there is no text outside of an
example
that describes using fermata as an articulation. (There is an index
en
cores.
Playing 52 bars rest Largo is tough going I can tell you!
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of David
Kastrup
Sent: Sat 7/17/2010 9:13
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: fermata not shown at playing parts
"Trev
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> Carl Sorensen wrote Saturday, July 17, 2010 6:10 AM
>
>> But in the Expressive Marks section there is no text outside of an
>> example
>> that describes using fermata as an articulation. (There is an index
>> entry
>> for \fermata, however).
>
> OK, I've added a para t
Carl Sorensen wrote Saturday, July 17, 2010 6:10 AM
But in the Expressive Marks section there is no text outside of an
example
that describes using fermata as an articulation. (There is an
index entry
for \fermata, however).
OK, I've added a para to Articulations and ornaments in Expressive
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:10:35PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 7/16/10 9:49 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > The docs already say to use \fermata !
>
> But in the Expressive Marks section there is no text outside of an example
> that describes using fermata as an articulation. (There
Carl,
Yes, I found these sections. The two have confused me for over two years.
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 7/16/10 9:49 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> The docs already say to use \fermata !
But in the Expressive Marks section there is no text outside of an example
that describes using fermata as an articulation. (There is an index entry
for \fermata, however).
And in the Full measure rests
The docs already say to use \fermata !
- Graham
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:18:56PM +0800, 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng wrote:
>Then you should add this to the doc in case of confusion to other people.
>
>Regards
>Haipeng
>
>
>
> ---
Then you should add this to the doc in case of confusion to other people.
Regards
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Am Freitag, 16. Juli 2010, 14:47:42 schrieb 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng:
> My teacher found that my fermatas are only
> on the silent parts. Must I use \fermata instead of ^\fermataMarkup?
Yes, as a rule, on normal notes and rests always use \fermata, only on full-
measure rests (written as R1 etc.) use ^\fe
Hello,
I encount a serious problem. My teacher found that my fermatas are only on
the silent parts. When I gave him the following snippet, the problem persisted.
Is it a bug? Must I use \fermata instead of ^\fermataMarkup?
Regards
Haipeng
\version "2.13.24"
\layout {
\context {
\StaffGrou
14 matches
Mail list logo
