Alex,
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Alex Jones
wrote:
> This worked like a charm, thanks to everyone!
>
>
Great!
Thought of something. Why specify the numbers of the time signature in
effect? Not that it saves much time, but you could do this for a slightly
shorter input:
#(define ((time
This worked like a charm, thanks to everyone!
-akj
On May 23, 2015, at 7:05 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> #(define ((time-parenthesized-time up down upp downp) grob)
>(ly:stencil-combine-at-edge
> (grob-interpret-markup grob
> (markup #:override '(baseline-skip . 0) #:number #:colum
Hi Alex,
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Alex Jones
wrote:
> Thank you, this works!
>
> It does look a little clunky.
>
I agree--there's too much space. A simple fix is to use \concat, which
puts items directly beside each other, instead of \line in the original
function:
\version "2.18"
#(
Thank you, this works!
It does look a little clunky.
I saw this, which gets the parentheses but doesn’t include the first
non-parenthesized item. Can these two items be combined?
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/snippets/staff-notation#staff-notation-time-signature-in-parenthe
maybe this helps?
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=782
ole
Am 23.05.2015 um 23:44 schrieb Alex Jones :
> Does anyone have a suggestion for a good way to accomplish this in lilypond?
>
> time signature with a second time signature in parentheses?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> -akj
>
>
> __
.47 PM.png (14K)
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/176955/0/Screen%20Shot%202015-05-23%20at%205.41.47%20PM.png>;
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/time-signature-magic-tp176955p176956.html
Sent from the User mailing li
Does anyone have a suggestion for a good way to accomplish this in lilypond?
time signature with a second time signature in parentheses?
Thanks in advance!
-akj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf
