Ping...
I just reproduced this ACPI error with 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes +
a crypto patch from Herbert + two nodemgr patched from Stefan + a max
trace depth patch from Ingo.
Any additional debug information needed? Any progress?
Thanks,
Miles
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send t
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:25 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> If we decide that "try HID first, then try CID" is the right thing,
>> I think we should figure out how to make that work. Maybe that
>> means extending the driver model somehow.
> Don't think it's easy, especially no other bus needs it
Hi Kristen.
Great to see this!
Allow me to anticipate a question I'm sure will come: will this play
well with (say) suspending while docked and resuming undocked?
Regards,
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:25 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 September 2006 20:03, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 04:04 +0800, keith mannthey wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 11:59 -0700, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > > > From one of the ACPI guys:
> > > >
> > > > > Get h
Hello,
Ever since I put out the docking station patches people have been asking me
if I could get removable drive bays to work as well. These are devices such
as the IBM/Lenovo Ultrabay, or the Dell Module Bay - basically removable disk
drives. There is an IBM platform specific solution that work
This driver adds generic removable drive bay support.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/bay.c
===
--- /dev/null
+++ 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/bay.c
@@ -0,0 +1,592 @@
+/*
+ * bay.c - ACP
When determining if a device is on a dock station, we should
check the parent of the device as well.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: 2.6-git/drivers/acpi/dock.c
===
--- 2.6-git.orig/drivers/acpi/doc
Hi,
On Friday, 8 September 2006 00:08, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > (Just for the record, suspend with snd_hda_intel seems to work
> > > > here...)
> > >
> > > The problem seems to be related to the MSI. Andrew and Greg KH say the
> > > MSI code have been rewritten recently, so there's s
Hi!
> > > (Just for the record, suspend with snd_hda_intel seems to work
> > > here...)
> >
> > The problem seems to be related to the MSI. Andrew and Greg KH say the
> > MSI code have been rewritten recently, so there's some hope.
>
> I've just learnt that it's possible to disable the MSI in s
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 20:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:55:11 +0200
> Maciej Rutecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Bjorn Helgaas napisał(a):
> > >
> > > This ACPI "unknown exception code" problem is the same one reported here:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 20:03, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 04:04 +0800, keith mannthey wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 11:59 -0700, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > > From one of the ACPI guys:
> > >
> > > > Get hid
> > > > Look for driver
> > > > If you find a match, load it
>
On Thursday, 7 September 2006 09:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 September 2006 23:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Wed 2006-09-06 22:47:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, 6 September 2006 12:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > > Now, the
On Wednesday, 6 September 2006 23:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2006-09-06 22:47:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday, 6 September 2006 12:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > Now, the output of /proc/interrupts with everything loaded is
> > > >
> > > >
13 matches
Mail list logo
