On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:21:33 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:21:29 -0800,
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a __crit :
ug, sorry, if I'd realised it was like this I'd have said don't
bother. Apart from the obvious problem, this means that people will
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:55:02 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Le Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:13:40 -0800,
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Option 3 wold be to add more #ifdef CONFIG_DMI lines around the
place. How ugly would that get?
Like the attached patch. #ifdef CONFIG_DMI
Le Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:13:40 -0800,
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Option 3 wold be to add more #ifdef CONFIG_DMI lines around the
place. How ugly would that get?
Like the attached patch. #ifdef CONFIG_DMI everywhere :-(
Sincerly,
Thomas
---
Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable
Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:41:47 -0800,
Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Does this patch apply to -mm? Seem like No.
No, it was generated against 2.6.25-rc2.
After converting it from mime(?) to ASCII
Probably due to my PGP-MIME signature. Will try to remember
Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:41:47 -0800,
Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Does this patch apply to -mm? Seem like No.
No, it was generated against 2.6.25-rc2.
After converting it from mime(?) to ASCII
Probably due to my PGP-MIME signature. Will try to remember that
I should disable it
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:55:02 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:13:40 -0800,
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a __crit :
Option 3 wold be to add more #ifdef CONFIG_DMI lines around the
place. How ugly would that get?
Like the attached patch. #ifdef
Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:21:29 -0800,
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
ug, sorry, if I'd realised it was like this I'd have said don't
bother. Apart from the obvious problem, this means that people will
keep breaking CONFIG_DMI=n all the time, because they will forget the
ifdefs, and
Hi,
Le Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:44:10 -0800,
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Bustage in x86-configurable-dmi-scanning-code.patch. Previously,
DMI=y was just hardwired. Now, it becomes selectable and stuff
breaks.
I guess the DMI=n version of dmi_check_system() could become a macro
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:15:36 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Le Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:44:10 -0800,
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a __crit :
Bustage in x86-configurable-dmi-scanning-code.patch. Previously,
DMI=y was just hardwired. Now, it becomes selectable and
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
ACPI is enabled, but DMI=n.
linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/drivers/acpi/thermal.c: In function 'acpi_thermal_init':
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:16:03 -0800 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
ACPI is enabled, but DMI=n.
11 matches
Mail list logo