On 11/21/2009 03:21 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> I am personally appalled by the debacle that LASH turned into.
> Stemming from a proposal made years ago (by Bob Ham, I believe), LASH
> has gone more or less nowhere. It has never arrived at a stable,
> congruent and consistent specification, even vi
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Patrick Shirkey
wrote:
> It's not easy to find motivation for continuing development when a large
> subset of your ideas are received as fundamentally flawed because of the
> core design choice that enables their existence.
I think that I should be clear on why
Hi Nedko - I agree wholeheartedly with you are trying to achieve and think
your work could be quite important to the linux audio community
I have gone as far as running and testing (g)ladish - So far I haven't been
able to anything really useful to with it. I noticed that the next milestone
is sup
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
(hopefully you've all read what Nedko wrote...)
Nedko,
I can't comment on the technical merits or drawbacks of your project,
but I can say that as a user who wants Linux audio to be easier to
manage, the LADI(sh) project is one that I've bee
On 11/21/2009 01:00 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> On 11/20/2009 08:15 PM, Nedko Arnaudov wrote A LOT :)
>
> Nedko, are you on some kind of a meltdown or something?
>
> now that i was making my day (erm, night?:) with your lv2fil plugin, are
> you throwing in the towel (*) ?
>
> certainly you aren't
On 11/20/2009 08:15 PM, Nedko Arnaudov wrote A LOT :)
Nedko, are you on some kind of a meltdown or something?
now that i was making my day (erm, night?:) with your lv2fil plugin, are
you throwing in the towel (*) ?
certainly you aren't _that_ desperate, i hope.
am i too naive to assume you're j
>
>
> If I'd respond to all technical issues you raise the
> result would be a 30-page paper. Maybe I should present
> it a the next LAC, to be hung on the nearest high tree
> shortly afterwards.
I think you should (present at at the LAC, not be hung on the nearest
tree). That's a very good foru
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:15:20PM +0200, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
Nedko,
Since you refer to me twice in your post I feel free to
respond. And even if you may regard me as one of your
'adversaries', please don't take anything I write as
a comment on you personally.
Let me say first that I'm sorry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin Gareus wrote:
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
>>> How come the linuxaudio.org mirror (http://download.linuxaudio.org) is not
>>> any more updated with newer releases? Last version available on there is
>>> 7.04 which is truly enc
After recent discussion on IRC I'm loosing faith in whether it is worth
to contribute to linux audio session handling/management. Two reasons
were given why it does not get testing from users. One is that what I
did so far is not mature, has annoying bugs and I'm not wanting to fix
them. The other
10 matches
Mail list logo
