On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:03:58 +0200, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>Because netjack isn't good enough or cross platform enough or LGPL
>enough or adopted enough?
Hi,
yes, it's not cross platform enough.
Audiobus and other iPad apps provide Ableton Link. Jack doesn't run on
the iPad anymore, so there u
> On 09/19/2016 11:56 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>
>>> why?
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Tito Latini
>>> wrote:
>>>
What is the content of the network packets ?
Regardless, I'll ignore software with that technologogy.
>>>
>>
>> The OP seems to be suggesting that whoeve
On 09/19/2016 11:56 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>
>> why?
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Tito Latini
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What is the content of the network packets ?
>>>
>>> Regardless, I'll ignore software with that technologogy.
>>
>
> The OP seems to be suggesting that whoever has access
> why?
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Tito Latini
> wrote:
>
>> What is the content of the network packets ?
>>
>> Regardless, I'll ignore software with that technologogy.
>
The OP seems to be suggesting that whoever has access to the data captured
by Ableton Link or the potential backdoor
spectmorph-0.3.1 has been released.
Overview of Changes in spectmorph-0.3.1:
* Added plugins for LV2 and VST api.
* New instruments: bassoon, cello, bass-trombone, reed-organ.
* Added different templates to get standard morph plans quickly.
* LV2|VST|JACK w
why?
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Tito Latini wrote:
> What is the content of the network packets ?
>
> Regardless, I'll ignore software with that technologogy.
> ___
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://li
Hello again!
The 'Vee One Suite' aka. the 'gang of three' old-school homebrew
software instruments, respectively synthv1 [1], as a polyphonic
subtractive synthesizer, samplv1 [2], a polyphonic sampler synthesizer
and drumkv1 [3] as yet another drum-kit sampler, are here released on
their eleve
Hi Clemens,
On 19/09/16 13:27, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote:
>> * We want to deliver these events *ASAP* to the application -
>> scheduling adds latency, a lot;
>> * Timestamps are in the past relative to the central.
>>
>> But I still need the timestamp information. Why
Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote:
> * We want to deliver these events *ASAP* to the application -
> scheduling adds latency, a lot;
> * Timestamps are in the past relative to the central.
>
> But I still need the timestamp information. Why? The spec doesn't
> explain, but it makes sense to believe it
Hi Clemens,
On 17/09/16 08:42, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote:
>> On 16/09/16 18:41, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>>> Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote:
I have a question. I would like to send sequencer events without
scheduling but with a timestamp information associated wit
10 matches
Mail list logo