Re: [linux-audio-dev] API for playing wav file samples

2003-01-03 Thread Pascal Haakmat
04/01/03 12:30, Vandana wrote: > Hi, > I am building a sound editor and need an API for playing 'wav' > file samples. I tried the SOX API but the quality is very bad. Is there > some other API, I can try. Kindly advice. I'm not sure what it is that you want to do. Do you want to play wav

Re: [linux-audio-dev] API for playing wav file samples

2003-01-03 Thread Davy Durham
Vandana wrote: Hi, I am building a sound editor and need an API for playing 'wav' file samples. I tried the SOX API but the quality is very bad. Is there some other API, I can try. Kindly advice. . what language? And did you want it to actually play or just load/save wav files?

Re: [linux-audio-dev] API for playing wav file samples

2003-01-03 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003 12:30:24 +0530 (IST) Vandana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > I am building a sound editor and need an API for playing 'wav' > file samples. I tried the SOX API but the quality is very bad. Is there > some other API, I can try. There are a number of APIs. For rea

[linux-audio-dev] API for playing wav file samples

2003-01-03 Thread Vandana
Hi, I am building a sound editor and need an API for playing 'wav' file samples. I tried the SOX API but the quality is very bad. Is there some other API, I can try. Kindly advice.

Re: [linux-audio-dev] rave + rant (long)

2003-01-03 Thread Pascal Haakmat
04/01/03 13:08, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > The Rabbit (libsamplerate) > == > I am currently working on some major, rather gnarly, refactoring of > the internals which should result in about a 10-30% improvement > in throughput for the Sinc based converters. > > I am al

Re: [linux-audio-dev] rave + rant (long)

2003-01-03 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 17:34:22 -0500 Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but ... but ... i am just glowing with the way libraries like > libsamplerate and libsndfile provide the same simple "just plug it > together" functionality that the unix shell and all our pipe-connected > utilities do. th

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] 2.4.20 + lowlat +preempt +alsa + jack = dead computer

2003-01-03 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
> >I browsed the Kernel Source and there is only one mark_inode_dirty in > >pipe_write (in fs/pipe.c). So we know where it is hanging... > > > >And in __mark_inode_dirty (in fs/inode.c) there is one > > spin_lock(&inode_lock) > >call, and I guess that is where the whole thing is hanging. So som

Re: [linux-audio-dev] rave + rant

2003-01-03 Thread Vincent Touquet
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 05:34:22PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: (cut) >thanks to erik, thanks to RMS for the GPL and thanks to everybody on >this list and elsewhere who is making this revolution possible. >--p I'm glowing too :) Don't have the time right now to use all the great apps, but just readi

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] 2.4.20 + lowlat +preempt + alsa + jack = dead computer

2003-01-03 Thread Paul Davis
>I browsed the Kernel Source and there is only one mark_inode_dirty in >pipe_write (in fs/pipe.c). So we know where it is hanging... > >And in __mark_inode_dirty (in fs/inode.c) there is one > spin_lock(&inode_lock) >call, and I guess that is where the whole thing is hanging. So something >is h

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] 2.4.20 + lowlat +preempt +alsa + jack = dead computer

2003-01-03 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
[brief description of problem: jack + several other jack clients + disk activity - a tar process, for example - hangs the machine] > This is what I'm currently testing: > > 2.4.20 + capabilities + preempt + lowlat + > [from Con Koliva's page] > Read latency2 disk hack (Andrew Morton) + ACPI

RE: [linux-audio-dev] rave + rant

2003-01-03 Thread Mark Knecht
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Davis > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [linux-audio-dev] rave + rant > > > it really makes me feel good to be able to turn around and explain to > my dis

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Jackit-devel]2.4.20 + lowlat +preempt + alsa + jack = dead computer

2003-01-03 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
> > I don't have the time now to analyze the results but it would seem the > > problem is freqtweak in combination with jackd. When the system freezes > > after starting stuff from a text console, sysrq-p prints > > information about the current registers and the printout of repeated > > dumps only

[linux-audio-dev] rave + rant

2003-01-03 Thread Paul Davis
i just want to stop for a moment and reflect on the power of the open source software model. for a long time, a rather glaring defect in ardour was the inability to record at a higher frame rate (say, 48kHz or 96kHz) and then easily produce an audio file of the piece at 44.1kHz, the standard for re